My angle is a Top P4P fighter has no business being in a competitive fight with a fighter that has only fought above domestic level a handful of times.
Epsecially when their single fight after an injury lay-off he looked average against a Euro Level fighter.
So, yes. It makes Martinez not as good as many think.
A top P4P fighter has no business losing rounds and getting busted up by a fighter on Darren Barker's level.
And this means, what?
Am I supposed to care about that?
That fight was bull****, too.
But, atleast Mosley had fought a fighter who has fought on World Level in his fight before he fought Pacquaio. Something again, Barker has ever done.
It say's that Martinez stopped an unproven fighter who has fought no one his entire career?
And Pacquaio didn't stop a former world class fighter who hadn't won a fight in years?
Is there supposed to be a point here?
Well, it is.
Because Barker has fought above Domestic level only a handful of times and has never ever been ranked in the Top 10 in his lack luster career.
Do you understand that? Do yu understand how pathetic that is? For a Top P4P fighter to chose this person as his opponent?
Martinez was a 25/1 favourite in some bookies in Barkers country for a very good reason. Have Mayweather and Pac EVER been that much of a favourite in ANY of thier fights?
No, they haven't. For a very good reason.
So what? What does that mean?
So if Mayweather or Pac fight Kell Brook next that's a legit fight to you? Because they are giving an 'undefeated fighter a chance at world level'? No of course it isn't.
Being undefeated means literally nothing. Especially when Barker has fought bums literally his entire 23 fight career.
Stop being a hypocrite because if your 'Mission' is to exose cherrypickers than Martinez should top that list.
But that isn't your mission. Your mission is to hate Pacquaio and Mayweather.
You can't make it any more obvious when you try and defend Martinez fighting Barker.
Epsecially when their single fight after an injury lay-off he looked average against a Euro Level fighter.
So, yes. It makes Martinez not as good as many think.
A top P4P fighter has no business losing rounds and getting busted up by a fighter on Darren Barker's level.
And this means, what?
Am I supposed to care about that?
That fight was bull****, too.
But, atleast Mosley had fought a fighter who has fought on World Level in his fight before he fought Pacquaio. Something again, Barker has ever done.
It say's that Martinez stopped an unproven fighter who has fought no one his entire career?
And Pacquaio didn't stop a former world class fighter who hadn't won a fight in years?
Is there supposed to be a point here?
Well, it is.
Because Barker has fought above Domestic level only a handful of times and has never ever been ranked in the Top 10 in his lack luster career.
Do you understand that? Do yu understand how pathetic that is? For a Top P4P fighter to chose this person as his opponent?
Martinez was a 25/1 favourite in some bookies in Barkers country for a very good reason. Have Mayweather and Pac EVER been that much of a favourite in ANY of thier fights?
No, they haven't. For a very good reason.
So what? What does that mean?
So if Mayweather or Pac fight Kell Brook next that's a legit fight to you? Because they are giving an 'undefeated fighter a chance at world level'? No of course it isn't.
Being undefeated means literally nothing. Especially when Barker has fought bums literally his entire 23 fight career.
Stop being a hypocrite because if your 'Mission' is to exose cherrypickers than Martinez should top that list.
But that isn't your mission. Your mission is to hate Pacquaio and Mayweather.
You can't make it any more obvious when you try and defend Martinez fighting Barker.


Comment