Why the Slick AA Boxing style argument against Pac is total BS.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pistol whip
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 8645
    • 255
    • 4
    • 15,040

    #41
    Originally posted by johnm
    For the love of God. It's not what you were THINKING. It's exactly what you POSTED.
    And you misinterpreted it! If anyone is spinning things it's you! De la Hoya was a far more accomplished boxer than a lot of you give him credit for thats all im trying to say. People say manny has fought nothing but Plodders lately i disagree. Cotto and Oscar were both well rounded fighters and I used DLH vs Mayweather as an example. Sure he was not the same fighter but that still doesn't make him or Cotto ***ing plodders. so shut the *** up you hurt vagina stop reading into thing so much.

    Comment

    • johnm is...
      ****in *** Broads
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 10700
      • 820
      • 1,382
      • 48,813

      #42
      Originally posted by pistol whip
      And you misinterpreted it! If anyone is spinning things it's you! De la Hoya was a far more accomplished boxer than a lot of you give him credit for thats all im trying to say. People say manny has fought nothing but Plodders lately i disagree. Cotto and Oscar were both well rounded fighters and I used DLH vs Mayweather as an example. Sure he was not the same fighter but that still doesn't make him or Cotto ***ing plodders. so shut the *** up you hurt vagina stop reading into thing so much.
      You're tilting pretty bad here, pal.

      I'm not reading too much into anything. I'm telling it like it is.

      I know how accomplished Oscar was. The Oscar that fought Manny was a plodding, 147lb, dead man walking. And you damn well know it.

      Comment

      • johnm is...
        ****in *** Broads
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 10700
        • 820
        • 1,382
        • 48,813

        #43
        Originally posted by Amazinger
        lol john just say "funny how"...do I amuse you?.
        LOL. Don't get me started.

        Comment

        • pistol whip
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 8645
          • 255
          • 4
          • 15,040

          #44
          Originally posted by johnm
          Right here you are, trying to say that DLH wasn't a plodding fighter, because of the way he fought MAYWEATHER.

          Tell me again how I'm just "telling you what you're thinking".
          And he wasn't a plodding fighter even in the Pac fight. It was age that was his killer that night and that doesn't mean he suddenly became Antonio Margarito that night or changed his styles. He was ***ing old!

          Comment

          • johnm is...
            ****in *** Broads
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 10700
            • 820
            • 1,382
            • 48,813

            #45
            Originally posted by pistol whip
            And he wasn't a plodding fighter even in the Pac fight. It was age that was his killer that night and that doesn't mean he suddenly became Antonio Margarito that night or changed his styles. He was ***ing old!
            Yeah, he was just old. It had nothing to do with being weight drained. Barely able to maneuver. Just a little age, that's all.

            Right.

            No really...

            Right.

            Comment

            • pistol whip
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 8645
              • 255
              • 4
              • 15,040

              #46
              Originally posted by johnm
              You're tilting pretty bad here, pal.

              I'm not reading too much into anything. I'm telling it like it is.

              I know how accomplished Oscar was. The Oscar that fought Manny was a plodding, 147lb, dead man walking. And you damn well know it.
              It was becasue he was old! It wasn't becasue that was his style his entire career! He was a target because of age there is a giant diffrence.

              Comment

              • pistol whip
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 8645
                • 255
                • 4
                • 15,040

                #47
                Originally posted by johnm
                Yeah, he was just old. It had nothing to do with being weight drained. Barely able to maneuver. Just a little age, that's all.

                Right.

                No really...

                Right.
                A little age? Stop putting words in my mouth it was a lot of ***ing age! Age is what caused the poor reaction to the weight and inability to manuver dumbass! Stop trying to make it seem like im downplaying any of these facts when i in fact agree with you. Still doesn't change the fact that DLHs fighting style was never that of a plodding come forward brawler.

                Comment

                • johnm is...
                  ****in *** Broads
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 10700
                  • 820
                  • 1,382
                  • 48,813

                  #48
                  You can say it a thousand times. It's still not going to make it true.

                  Comment

                  • johnm is...
                    ****in *** Broads
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 10700
                    • 820
                    • 1,382
                    • 48,813

                    #49
                    Originally posted by pistol whip
                    A little age? Stop putting words in my mouth it was a lot of ***ing age! Age is what caused the poor reaction to the weight and inability to manuver dumbass! Stop trying to make it seem like im downplaying any of these facts when i in fact agree with you. Still doesn't change the fact that DLHs fighting style was never that of a plodding come forward brawler.
                    Yeah, I know what his style was. But you take a guy who's weight drained, and it WILL affect his performance. To think otherwise is just ******.

                    You can say "it's just age" all you want, but that's not true.

                    Comment

                    • pistol whip
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 8645
                      • 255
                      • 4
                      • 15,040

                      #50
                      Originally posted by johnm
                      Yeah, I know what his style was. But you take a guy who's weight drained, and it WILL affect his performance. To think otherwise is just ******.

                      And who exactly is dis*****g your ***ing claim??? Yes the weight affected his performance duh! All Im saying is that age is what caused the weight to be a factor! Everheard of a slowing metabolism? Bones becoming dense and heavier the older a man gets? Had De La Hoya been younger you don't think he could of made the weight safely?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP