Pacquiao not only ranked higher P4P than Mayweather, now ranked higher at 147 too....
Collapse
-
You said before that he shouldn't be ranked at all because he'd never fought at Welterweight. You seem to have changed your tune now. If he had never fought at Welterweight, he wouldn't be ranked at Welterweight.
But he wouldn't have risen in rank if it hadn't been for the facts that:
1) The Ring considered and still consider Floyd and Pac to be more or less joint #1s, so a very small change in circumstances can cause them to switch positions.
2) He fought that fight as a Welterweight; and beating a given fighter when you're a Welterweight and your opponent is a Jnr Middleweight is obviously more impressive than beating the same fighter when you both weigh under 147.
this is the thing with pacfans bigger is better and thats all that matters but if you watch mma forrest griffin was 15lbs bigger than anderson silva and how did that fight play out?bigger doesn't mean better and honestly margarito has not done anything to prove he is atleast a good bigman he just a big ****** manComment
-
Comment
-
And Clottey was still ranked #4 even after losing to Cotto. So Pac not only beat, but completely shut out, the #2 ranked fighter in the division, followed by the #4 ranked fighter in the division.
In any case, Pac got his #1 Ring ranking immediately after the Cotto fight, so the Pac-Clottey fight is irrelevant.Comment
-
But my point was that most fighters boil down to well under their natural weight for the weigh-in, whereas Pac doesn't.Comment
-
of course use an extreme comparison to make a point it just makes your point mean nothing, calderon bein probably the smallest fighter and vitali bein the biggest but i guess thats what people do when they don't have a logical rebuttalComment
-
you said before that he shouldn't be ranked at all because he'd never fought at welterweight. You seem to have changed your tune now. If he had never fought at welterweight, he wouldn't be ranked at welterweight.
But he wouldn't have risen in rank if it hadn't been for the facts that:
1) the ring considered and still consider floyd and pac to be more or less joint #1s, so a very small change in circumstances can cause them to switch positions.
2) he fought that fight as a welterweight; and beating a given fighter when you're a welterweight and your opponent is a jnr middleweight is obviously more impressive than beating the same fighter when you both weigh under 147.
As far as what he weighed at weigh in shouldn't matter when it comes to rankings.
That means i could weigh 135 at the weigh in but fight at jr mw and be ranked at lightweight. That doesn't make sense at all.
If you are to rise in the rankings in any division you must:
1. Fight at that weight and defeat a top rank fighter at that weight above you
2. Or someone ahead of you losesComment
-
you were saying cotto wasn't a top welterweight because he beat jennings and then lost to marg. You conveniently forgot that since losing to marg, he had beaten the #3 ranked fighter in the division, having beaten several other top welters prior to the marg defeat.
And clottey was still ranked #4 even after losing to cotto. So pac not only beat, but completely shut out, the #2 ranked fighter in the division, followed by the #4 ranked fighter in the division.
In any case, pac got his #1 ring ranking immediately after the cotto fight, so the pac-clottey fight is irrelevant.
And i never said cotto wasn't a top welter. I said that manny shouldn't be ranked #1 by just beating cotto or clottey for that matter.
There is no justifying this, this is some bullComment
-
Comment
Comment