Audley Harrison: "Haye Was Not Undisputed Cruiserweight Champion"

[bboy80]

It's pretty shocking how much media coverage this joke fight is getting over here.

Its sky as usual they would hype up a dog turd, if it was on ppv.

The other day Johnny Nelson was showing Mike Tyson clips of Fraudleys so called power via clips of him stopping Scott Belshaw.

The sky pundits have been contracted to say fraudley has a good chance, even Lennox came out and said Fraudley could win, who also happens to be working for sky on this.

De****able if you ask me, its the most one-sided championship fight there has been in a long long time.


Obv bar the Vitali - Briggs fight that was garbage as well.

[Pirao]

The only reason Steve Cunningham had a belt was because they stripped Jean Marc Mormeck of that belt.

Yeah, but Wlad should have the WBA belt too, since he beat Chagaev, and he doesn't.

[dvb]

The IBF isnt a major title,so it isnt all that important tbh.

Haye won the top 3 titles and the ring title,the ring title alone should be enough to say he was the best at that division.

plus he coudlnt really stick around fighting for the lesser scraps of titles to be the absolute undisputed with all crusier belts out there,he could barely make the weight,its why hes better now at heavy,taking better punches,with more power and having better stamina and more energy in fights.

He would have easily beaten adamek ect,he could still fight ademek next if klits. ***** out again, adamek and all others at cruiser or heavy cannot take hayes power and cannot handle his speed!.

[Mr. Philadel]

my son is 5 yrs old and he even know Haye wasn't the UNDISPUTED CW champ....I'm glad Audley deaded that myth about Haye's legacy on national TV....thumbs up to A-Force

[REMOVED SHARK 97]

After all his trash talk and bragging, David Haye is fighting a 39 year old journeyman.



Last year Haye said Audley wasn't good enough to fight on his undercard.

I'm hyped hoping for something special, I ain't paying for it just another FSS stream ready for Pacman v Brickfists.

But it'll be a good filler for the night, seeing one of them being humbled.

[Pirao]

The IBF isnt a major title,so it isnt all that important tbh.

Of course it is, I don't know what you're on about.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No, he fought Mormeck LATER.

Bell cancelled the fight with Cunningham because he said he had a toothache.

You are not countering my argument. He took a bigger, better, more anticipated fight. He didnt lose the belt in the ring.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Yeah, but Wlad should have the WBA belt too, since he beat Chagaev, and he doesn't.

What the *** does that have to do with anything? I never dispusted Wlad should have the WBA belt.

Seriously sometimes you guys sound like a bunch of crybabies

[Dirk Diggler UK]

my son is 5 yrs old and he even know Haye wasn't the UNDISPUTED CW champ....I'm glad Audley deaded that myth about Haye's legacy on national TV....thumbs up to A-Force

Haye was as good as undisputed as you will get these days. If Bell had taken the IBF mandatory against Cunningham, he wouldve been stripped of one of the other belts. And you'd have people like Tunney saying he ducked a rematch with Mormeck.

Bottom line is, Mormeck was the rightful owner of 3 belts. Haye beat Mormeck. Haye took the other belt. He was undisputed.

[Jim Jeffries]

What the *** does that have to do with anything? I never dispusted Wlad should have the WBA belt.

Seriously sometimes you guys sound like a bunch of crybabies

I think what he's saying is you can't have it both ways. Either Haye was undisputed at CW or he is a legit HW title holder.