Quote: "Manny Pacquiao is great. Marquez is just as great."
Collapse
-
-
In terms of fighting each other, yes. Both fights could have gone either way.
In terms of resume without fighting each other, Pac resume is better.Comment
-
How do you define a "big boy". Was it because at lightwieght and jr. lightweight, Pac's fight night weight is 145-148. Even if he is fighting at WW and jr. WW, he is still outweigh by his opponents during fight night.Comment
-
Again first fight he did but with the point system it was still a fight that could of gone either way.
2nd fight I don't think he "outboxed" he probably won the fight but not "outboxed" him ala what Whitaker did to Oscar did type of outboxing. The rematch was still a pretty close competitve fight that could of gone either way.
If you think JMM won both fights, I will not argue I can see that. Because, it were close fights that could of gone either way. JMM does have a case for winning both. However, Pac has the same case for winning both. It was close no robbery at all.
Whitaker and Quartey have more of an argument of getting screwed against Oscar that JMM has against Pac. Kotelnik has more of an argument of getting screwed against Alexander than what JMM has against Pac.Comment
-
Considering how long ago it was said, it's kind of irrelevant if we agree or not. At the time, Pac beat a dehydrated De La Hoya. While Marquez proved how skilled of a boxer he was by KOing Diaz in a war. At the time, it was a safe thing to say.Comment
-
Again first fight he did but with the point system it was still a fight that could of gone either way.
2nd fight I don't think he "outboxed" he probably won the fight but not "outboxed" him ala what Whitaker did to Oscar did type of outboxing. The rematch was still a pretty close competitve fight that could of gone either way.
If you think JMM won both fights, I will not argue I can see that. Because, it were close fights that could of gone either way. JMM does have a case for winning both. However, Pac has the same case for winning both. It was close no robbery at all.
Whitaker and Quartey have more of an argument of getting screwed against Oscar that JMM has against Pac. Kotelnik has more of an argument of getting screwed against Alexander than what JMM has against Pac.Comment
-
probably if this poll was made at the time, this would have been closer, but as it is now PAC has pulled out form the pack (MAB, EM & JMM)Comment
-
Dude, i'd go so far as saying that Vic Darchinyan could've beaten that De La Hoya, the dude was totally weight drained, are we still having this discussion?Comment
-
hmmm.. good argument, Pacquiao is posted up high on that board. i think if JMM got the same chances as Manny, he'd still end up a little lower, but not far behind. but then i'd kind of be saying that JMM is better than Julio Cesar Chavez right?
i don't know, good post.Comment
-
Comment