Originally posted by BROOKLYN CESAR
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Quote: "Manny Pacquiao is great. Marquez is just as great."
Collapse
-
-
In terms of fighting each other, yes. Both fights could have gone either way.
In terms of resume without fighting each other, Pac resume is better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yesir View Postthats b.c pac is a bigboy. not some small guy fighting big boys. should have been in the "big boy" classes, long ago. and not fighting at catchweights
How do you define a "big boy". Was it because at lightwieght and jr. lightweight, Pac's fight night weight is 145-148. Even if he is fighting at WW and jr. WW, he is still outweigh by his opponents during fight night.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Poochiao View PostJMM "outboxed" Pacquiao in both fights. That sounds a lot better.
2nd fight I don't think he "outboxed" he probably won the fight but not "outboxed" him ala what Whitaker did to Oscar did type of outboxing. The rematch was still a pretty close competitve fight that could of gone either way.
If you think JMM won both fights, I will not argue I can see that. Because, it were close fights that could of gone either way. JMM does have a case for winning both. However, Pac has the same case for winning both. It was close no robbery at all.
Whitaker and Quartey have more of an argument of getting screwed against Oscar that JMM has against Pac. Kotelnik has more of an argument of getting screwed against Alexander than what JMM has against Pac.
Comment
-
Considering how long ago it was said, it's kind of irrelevant if we agree or not. At the time, Pac beat a dehydrated De La Hoya. While Marquez proved how skilled of a boxer he was by KOing Diaz in a war. At the time, it was a safe thing to say.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostAgain first fight he did but with the point system it was still a fight that could of gone either way.
2nd fight I don't think he "outboxed" he probably won the fight but not "outboxed" him ala what Whitaker did to Oscar did type of outboxing. The rematch was still a pretty close competitve fight that could of gone either way.
If you think JMM won both fights, I will not argue I can see that. Because, it were close fights that could of gone either way. JMM does have a case for winning both. However, Pac has the same case for winning both. It was close no robbery at all.
Whitaker and Quartey have more of an argument of getting screwed against Oscar that JMM has against Pac. Kotelnik has more of an argument of getting screwed against Alexander than what JMM has against Pac.
Comment
-
Originally posted by paulsinghnl View PostJim Lampley said that after the 1st Juan Diaz fight. I agree, but i wonder what the forums thoughts are on this.
do you agree? and why?
let's make this a good discussions with valid arguments.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anti~Jalandoni View PostLOL at this you really think that Marquez could beat Dela Hoya...You have underestimated him, Pac was just faster than DLH but those Punches were still dangerous ..coming from a natural middleweight
Comment
-
Originally posted by | THE KING | View PostSo... 34% of you here think JMM is arguably a top 20 ATG?
hmmm.. good argument, Pacquiao is posted up high on that board. i think if JMM got the same chances as Manny, he'd still end up a little lower, but not far behind. but then i'd kind of be saying that JMM is better than Julio Cesar Chavez right?
i don't know, good post.
Comment
-
Comment