Carl Froch's resume >>> Joe Calzaghe's resume

[BennyST]

That last vid shows Calzaghe's opponent hitting him with a punch and the fight is still stopped in Calzaghe's favor. Pathetic.

They are all pathetic, but even Calzaghe was pissed off at that last one. That was just ridiculous.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Calzaghe: Eubank, Jones (old), Hopkins (old), Lacy, Bika, Manfredo, Veit, Brewer, Sheika, Kessler


Froch: Abraham, Dirrell, Kessler, Taylor, Jean Pascal, Jermain Taylor, Reid

(all prime)
If Joe would've fought Jones and Hopkins in their prime, he'd have a better argument.

Not only this, Joe clearly ducked Froch and retired rather than face him which makes it even worse.

In summary, Froch shits all over Calzaghe.

I love Froch,but Joey has the better resume off pure fact he beat B-Hop(I had B-Hop winning but it was a close fight can't be mad at the result)when he would/could still beat some of the top fighters in the sport at the moment..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Froch got schooled by Taylor and Dirrell. Taylor should have taken the knee, waste time and win on points. Dirrell shouldn't have fought like a chicken shít for the first 6 rounds, as soon as he came out of his shell it looked a mismatch of mass proportions, he was boxing Froch all around the ring.

And when Joe retired Froch wasn't even a world champion. If Joe didn't retire he would have fought Dawson, Johnson or maybe Bute.

Froch beat both Taylor and Dirrell in very clear fashion..He wore Taylor down which is why he could not think to take a knee he was out on his feet..Dirrell had to move,in the first 6 rds Froch is fresh and very dangerous he would not have been able to get out of range like he did in the late rds of that fight..Froch is a very underrated fight...

I don't think Joey would have fought Dawson(Or he would have fought Dawson)Johnson or Bute..His track record shows he avoided prime tough competition...

[RichCCFC]

Hopkins>Pascal
Kessler>Taylor
Eubank>Dirrell
Reid>Reid
Jones>??
Lacy>??
Bika>??
Brewer>??
Mitchell>??
Veit>??
Sheika>??
Woodhall>??

3 good wins for Froch but besides that, nothing on his resume.

[Squizz]

LOL@ Froch "clearly" beating Dirrell. Dirrell got robbed.

[RichCCFC]

If you think Froch has a better resume.

YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT BOXING and that's a fact.

[SirTomJones]

LOL Insest you are such an attenion seeking whore.

Proabably the reason you are all over Margarito at the moment. Just to be different. You'll drop Tony just like you will drop Froch if they get knocked out in their next fights.

[SirTomJones]

End Thread!

[El Fenomeno]

Calzaghe: Eubank, Jones (old), Hopkins (old), Lacy, Bika, Manfredo, Veit, Brewer, Sheika, Kessler


Froch: Abraham, Dirrell, Kessler, Taylor, Jean Pascal, Jermain Taylor, Reid

(all prime)
If Joe would've fought Jones and Hopkins in their prime, he'd have a better argument.

Not only this, Joe clearly ducked Froch and retired rather than face him which makes it even worse.

In summary, Froch shits all over Calzaghe.

Just a few points:

A) Calzaghe fought a tougher version of Kessler. Zag beat him, Froch didn't.
B) Froch's win over Dirrell was 'debatable' to say the least.
C) Froch hasn't even fought Abraham yet, I have him losing that fight.
D) You've included Jermain Taylor twice on Froch's resume.

To summarize, Calzaghe has a much better resume at this point in time. Plus he's undefeated.

[Squizz]

King Arthur is gonna' put this fool to sleep. End of story.