Please someone with commonsense tell me how you discredit floyds hatton win

[p4p-champ]

It can't be discredited, if it is, then its worse for Manny cause he finished the left over scraps.

[-EX-]

I give Floyd full credit for beating Hatton...and I give Pac full credit for beating Hatton(can't blame Pac that Hatton fought ******)...

[jrosales13]

It can't be discredited, if it is, then its worse for Manny cause he finished the left over scraps.

What if Pacquiao haters discredit?

Then can it be discredit?

[Sin City]

He looked bad against Collazo and Urango.
He fought a shop worn Castillo that didn't warrant a fight.
Besides beating Tszyu, he never beat anybody.
He was a big name that made lots of money but that's about it.
It's not a great win for Manny or Floyd.

[borikua]

Good win, but 140 was Hatton's best weight.

[borikua]

You have to give him credit, that the only undefeated fighter that Floyd had fought since Corrales back in 02.

[Sin City]

It was a spectacular win. And many fans here and abroad expected Ricky to batter Floyd from pillar to post. Problem is, the way Floyd beat Ricky. Most were in absolute shock at the way Ricky lost. Besides, if Floyd would have refused to fight him, we would have an umpteen amount of threads about Floyd ducking Ricky when Ricky called him out.

there's always someone who thinks one guy can beat another.. doesn't mean ****. especially, when they are delusional.

[Sin City]

You have to give him credit, that the only undefeated fighter that Floyd had fought since Corrales back in 02.

I could whoop 30 little school girls and be undefeated.. that doesn't mean shit.

[shade darkar]

thats easy. hatton was not a welterweight, joe cortez, and the fact that mayweather is better than hatton was! haha. pacs win ver hatton was much better.

[shade darkar]

saying floyd didnt fight hatton at 140 and 147 was to high for hatton when floyd himself started at 130???

so, that dont mean **** when you weigh in at 147!