We thought Manny Pacquiao was great, he's much better than we thought.
Manny is good not great(heres why)
Collapse
-
-
who said shot to ****? I know I didn't
and wtf does being ranked have to do with anything
you think Peden and Fana were awesome wins? you think the first Juarez fight wasn't close and didn't start to indicate how Barrera was past his prime?
dear goodness Mak please tell me you are not sitting there blindly defending Barrera to sake Manny?Comment
-
Comment
-
this is as bad as people going up in arms over Barrera
Marco was still close enough to prime, combined with Manny being still raw, to where this is a great win
what Barrera did to Salud Hamed and Sanchez was an indication of the changes he had gone through from a puncher/boxer to a boxer/puncher
and consider this
did anyone outside of a few diehard fans even know who Pacquiao was when he **** kicked Barrera?Comment
-
wtf?
who said shot to ****? I know I didn't
and wtf does being ranked have to do with anything
you think Peden and Fana were awesome wins? you think the first Juarez fight wasn't close and didn't start to indicate how Barrera was past his prime?
dear goodness Mak please tell me you are not sitting there blindly defending Barrera to sake Manny?
no, not at all...but lets not make it seem like Barrera was being held up on strings fighting taxi cab drivers
he moved up in weight and took Morales' title
whooped his mandatory challengers
then fought probably the best version of Juarez in his career
to insinuate that he was on his way out because of one loss is ridiculous...THAT version of Marco was still better than most fighters at that timeComment
-
That win to me anyways for Tapia to skip 122(I think) showed that he wasn't what he once was. But, at least had something left. And, for Barrera to beat him the way he did. Is not really that deceptive IMO anyways.
Yes Kevin Kelly had seen better days. But, that is the way an elite fighter should do against a fighter like that version against Kevin Kelly. And, Barrera did that in 4 rounds.
I think he was prime. And, Barrera had a lot of momentum going for him. Like you said nobody really gave Pac a shot of winning. If you want to say it was close, I take that but. IMO he was prime. However, my opinion is just as good as the next man.Comment
-
Comment
-
Just cuz I know the only one on here saying that Pac is not great but just very good are Floyd fans like Kev, Ferwhateverhisnameis, and TS. I will say this.
Floyd has never beaten anybody as versatile as that version of Barrera that Pac beat the first time.Comment
-
too lazy to look it up but how many slick, defensive counter punchers has Floyd beaten?Comment
Comment