Interesting video on drug test issue

[deejd]

Yes but the difference is that this is a 100 million dollar fight. Both fighters are bound to receive the 30M at the minimum. So the penalty should be equitable with purse...

Their share of the purse doesn't go to just themselves and themselves only. That's where the problem is with the $10 million penalty if it was for a fighter who struggles to make the limit.

Since Mayweather wouldn't struggle, he accepted with pleasure. Then the excuses started flying over there at Top Rank.

[Reloaded]

Barring the insults, you actually nail it in the head. We are arguing about topics that is so 2009. Its already late 2010, and you *****s keeps on rehashing the same **** again and again. You are right, this argument is so moot but whats even pathetic is that Floyd is on vacation, and you keep bringing the same **** up instead of talking about the next fight that its actually happening..

Only because you have no answers from 2009 till now you ignore import aspects and hone in on childish hero worship crap , you have no timeline and just pluck **** from anywhere to suit your bull**** , if you lay out the timeline and present eveything in its true cronological order of happening , you lose badly and Team Pac are shown as sceaming liars lol , thats right I forgot Manny is a politition and history says liars do well at politics .

[FloydTBE]

Hope to see this settled once n for alll, n these 2 guys fight 2011

[mikemurni]

Their share of the purse doesn't go to just themselves and themselves only. That's where the problem is with the $10 million penalty if it was for a fighter who struggles to make the limit.

Since Mayweather wouldn't struggle, he accepted with pleasure. Then the excuses started flying over there at Top Rank.

So what?.. Thats why its a penalty.. The penalty is for the fighter who violated the terms.. Whether its a struggle or not, both are professionals, therefore they should abide by the contract agreement.

No, the excuses came from both camp when Floyd started demanding the random testing...

[IMDAZED]

What the ****.. You just said that the argument is months old.. Well I just agreed with you.. This whole **** is so 2009.

So then why are you in here? Aside from spreading bad info and proving that even an idiot can use a keyboard? Pray, tell.

[mikemurni]

So then why are you in here? Aside from spreading bad info and proving that even an idiot can use a keyboard? Pray, tell.

Hehehe.. Why not?

[deejd]

Pac and his managers rejected that proposal to fight at 154 with Yuri Foreman. I mean why did you think that Pac fought Clottey instead of Foreman..Both fighters are Top Rank

This is what Pac said after the Cotto fight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlTYbWWOH7g

Skip to 3:52. .. So who is checkmated now...

Then why were they ever in talks at '54?? In fact, Roach was the one who stated they wanted to get Yuri Foreman at '54. I specifically remember that because I questioned why not a slick African-american like Cory Spinks who was a beltholder. Or better yet, why not fight a boxer-puncher like Sergio Martinez for the title. I was questioning 'why Foreman?' Yet you still avoid the fact that Mayweather wanted the fight at '54 first; "hence stalling in negotiations" per reading the provided source. That's why they moved on to Yuri Foreman.

It's okay, Mike. You still gain negative yards with every response.

[deejd]

Only because you have no answers from 2009 till now you ignore import aspects and hone in on childish hero worship crap , you have no timeline and just pluck **** from anywhere to suit your bull**** , if you lay out the timeline and present eveything in its true cronological order of happening , you lose badly and Team Pac are shown as sceaming liars lol , thats right I forgot Manny is a politition and history says liars do well at politics .

Politicians never lie, they always cut taxes.

[IMDAZED]

Hehehe.. Why not?

Spoken like the dummy you are. ****outtahere.

[mikemurni]

Then why were they ever in talks at '54?? In fact, Roach was the one who stated they wanted to get Yuri Foreman at '54. I specifically remember that because I questioned why not a slick African-american like Cory Spinks who was a beltholder. Or better yet, why not fight a boxer-puncher like Sergio Martinez for the title. I was questioning 'why Foreman?' Yet you still avoid the fact that Mayweather wanted the fight at '54 first; "hence stalling in negotiations" per reading the provided source. That's why they moved on to Yuri Foreman.

It's okay, Mike. You still gain negative yards with every response.

Roach makes a lot of comments that are inconsistent. When Roach says "Mayweather is easy work". Do you agree with him? If you want to make his words as a basis of your argument then you have to be consistent. You cant just agree with him because it support ur argument. You have to do so all the way. He also says that "NSAC should dictate the medical program", obviously you dont believe him on this one.

Foreman-Pac did not happen, so why are you tryin to use a fight that did not take place as a basis for your argument.