Manny Pacquiao vs Tommy Hearns [147]

[BennyST]

DLH has 5 in height advantage and got schooled by Pac. Let me remind you that Hearns chin was made of crystal. One Pac straight left can end it anytime.

You my friend are a ****ing tool. I saw a million guys predicting Pac;s wins over all the same guys you did. Maybe you forget, but Pac was a favourite in all those fights except Oscar and Oscar was shot and ****.

This is Hearns we're talking about. Not a 36 year old part time, shot fighter who couldn't make weight without coming in as a zombie.

Hey, if Pac lands his left, you don't think that means he would be right in Hearns' range for his right? Who is likely to fold quicker; Pac under the Hearns right or Hearns under the Pac left? Considering the only time Hearns was ever down at 147 was against Leonard in the fourteenth from exhaustion, not lack of a chin, I'll go with Pac.

****ing moron.

Pac was knocked out twice and has been down as mahny times as Hearns. Hearns three times. They are even in the chin category.

Why am I even having this conversation? As I said earlier, if you are ****ed in the head enough to think Pac has a chance in this fight. You are nothing but a ****** that just says "Pac wins" out of habit and not out of any rational thought. You are just another Ronnie.

[Blooper]

tommy will duran pac.

no doubt about it.

[megas30]

if pac was a little bigger he beats hearns by ko!.....otherwise he's too damn big for pac!

Stay away, *******s!!! This is a trap to exposed your low boxing IQ!!!

[puga]

Stay away, *******s!!! This is a trap to exposed your low boxing IQ!!!

your IQ is lower!........

[Kagami Taiga]

lol...some of the comments in this thread are funny. i doubt pac beats a guy like hearns at any weight. hearns was just too damn good, too damn long, and too damn powerful. he was a natural welter and yet u still had the guy knocking ppl out at middleweight. nuff said...

[Too_Slick]

Tommy Hearns flat out obliterates Manny Pacquiao at 147. Don't get it twisted, Manny has not fight a live contender since 135. His win over Cotto was ok, but I give it a B win at best. Tommy Hearns has faster hands, better footwork, and WAY more power. I mean, the power isn't even close. Manny doesn't exactly have the best chin, even in lower weight classes he was getting knocked out and put down on his ass, and he has NEVER fought anybody that hits near as hard as Tommy Hearns.

If anybody thinks otherwise, you're probably a *******. Pac is good, but he should be matched up against guys like Roberto Duran.

Manny has not proven that he is any threat, or even a top contender at 147. He hasn't fought anybody.

He couldn't even knock out Clottey, and it took him 12 rounds to do in Cotto.

And don't ignore how many shots Clottey got in on Manny. For the few punches he threw, he sure did land quite a bit - he hit him at will, almost everytime he threw a punch it landed.

Tommy Hearns, KO inside of 5 rounds. This fight goes down Pipino Cuevas style.

Could have not been said better, if anyone thinks otherwise. Hearns by the most brutal 2 rounds Pac's ever been in.

[nelsoncm]

Stay away, *******s!!! This is a trap to exposed your low boxing IQ!!!

Right. You *******s with low IQ, don't fall for a trap "TO EXPOSED" yourselves.

[brick wall]

hearns retired as a cruiserweight for chrissakes...that's how big he was.
he started off as welterweight and climbed up to cruiser. whereas pac, he started as lightfly and would probably retire as a welter. even in a fantasy fight this match up doesn't make sense at all and it doesn't matter whether hearns is an atg or not.

[bose]

pac in 6oz. gloves, its obvious

[DARKSEID]

yea i went there.
im just gonna let u guys duke it out over this. im not gonna call it either way.
im not an expert.
so what happens and why???....

It's what we thought De La Hoya vs Pac would have looked like.. if De La hoya didn't turn out to be shot.