Manny Pacquiao vs Tommy Hearns [147]

[CarlosG815]

yea i went there.
im just gonna let u guys duke it out over this. im not gonna call it either way.
im not an expert.
so what happens and why???....

Tommy Hearns flat out obliterates Manny Pacquiao at 147. Don't get it twisted, Manny has not fight a live contender since 135. His win over Cotto was ok, but I give it a B win at best. Tommy Hearns has faster hands, better footwork, and WAY more power. I mean, the power isn't even close. Manny doesn't exactly have the best chin, even in lower weight classes he was getting knocked out and put down on his ass, and he has NEVER fought anybody that hits near as hard as Tommy Hearns.

If anybody thinks otherwise, you're probably a *******. Pac is good, but he should be matched up against guys like Roberto Duran.

Manny has not proven that he is any threat, or even a top contender at 147. He hasn't fought anybody.

He couldn't even knock out Clottey, and it took him 12 rounds to do in Cotto.

And don't ignore how many shots Clottey got in on Manny. For the few punches he threw, he sure did land quite a bit - he hit him at will, almost everytime he threw a punch it landed.

Tommy Hearns, KO inside of 5 rounds. This fight goes down Pipino Cuevas style.

[SusieQ.]

Tommy Hearns flat out obliterates Manny Pacquiao at 147. Don't get it twisted, Manny has not fight a live contender since 135. His win over Cotto was ok, but I give it a B win at best. Tommy Hearns has faster hands, better footwork, and WAY more power. I mean, the power isn't even close. Manny doesn't exactly have the best chin, even in lower weight classes he was getting knocked out and put down on his ass, and he has NEVER fought anybody that hits near as hard as Tommy Hearns.

If anybody thinks otherwise, you're probably a *******. Pac is good, but he should be matched up against guys like Roberto Duran.

Manny has not proven that he is any threat, or even a top contender at 147. He hasn't fought anybody.

He couldn't even knock out Clottey, and it took him 12 rounds to do in Cotto.

And don't ignore how many shots Clottey got in on Manny. For the few punches he threw, he sure did land quite a bit - he hit him at will, almost everytime he threw a punch it landed.

Tommy Hearns, KO inside of 5 rounds. This fight goes down Pipino Cuevas style.

ok thanks. i just didnt know lol. ill take ur word for it.

[CarlosG815]

JW Pac wins
WW Hearns wins

my 2 cents.

uhhh, when did Hearns fight at JWW, and where did he even ask about a fight at 140? And why would Pac win at 140 anyway? Cause you're a *******? That argument doesn't hold water, son. Pac loses to Hearns at any weight.

[Pacdbest]

STFU, seriously I am tired of reading your dumb shit. Is useless to debate with you man. Just STFU, don't post anymore.

And, neither DLH, Hatton, nor Cotto is 1/5 as good as Hearns was at WW.

And, Hearns would KO Floyd aslo.

Hearns would take Pac head off.

Is just ridiculous to think other wise.

Now please STFU.

You weren't even Born yet when I was watching Hearn's got TKOed by SRL. There's a reason Why I Predicted what Pac can do, I have seen these ATGs in the 70s & 80s and that's How I saw Pac in the 1st time I saw him beating up Barrera.

And that is all also the reason why I claimed 3-4 years ago that Pac can beat Hatton, DLH, Cotto & PBF. Because I saw Pac as better than SRL & Hearns. So you can imagine anything but u cant change a thing. Hearns, srl, Duran were done!! Pac's not done yet! You will see more. After Pac's done with his carreer, I will bump this thread and I will Say. I TOLD YOU SO!!.

[Pacdbest]

Hearns wins by KO second round using his 7" height advantage and his reach, and equally fast hands, and the most devastating right hand under the heavyweight division in the history of the world.

DLH has 5 in height advantage and got schooled by Pac. Let me remind you that Hearns chin was made of crystal. One Pac straight left can end it anytime.

[BennyST]

Why keep on putting Pac in fantasy fights against all time great WWs?

Hearns takes his head off man.

Just too much, is not really fair to compare Pac against all time great WWs. Is just not IMO.

JW Pac wins
WW Hearns wins

my 2 cents.

JWW? What the ****? That's like asking who wins between Pac and Jimmy Wilde at Fly. It's a ****** goddamned argument that has no merit. Hearns weighed in at 140 for about two fights at the start of his career against full fledged 147ers. He was a WW and always will be.

Anyway, this is such a ****** ****ing thread. Anyone, and I mean anyone, who thinks Pac has the most minute of chances in this fight are simply completely deluded against reality.

Hearns was over 6 foot. He had as much speed as Pac. He had the power to knock out CW's, LHW's, MW's, JMW's and nearly everyone at WW.

Let me ask all you great, knowledgeable Pac fans that think he has a chance this question; What is the punch Pac is most likely to get hit with? Jab and right hand you say? Wow! Ok, so what is the consensus among historians and experts as to what is probably the hardest, fastest, most devastating right hand shot in all of boxings long history.

You guessed it! The Hearns right hand. The one that blizted the unknockoutable Roberto Duran in two rounds (who had a hell of a lot better chin and defence that Pac could dream of having). The one that knocked down Ray Leonard, nearly put Hagler out and absolutely destroyed fighters twice the size of Pac.

He is great, there is no denying that. But, to claim he has the slightest chance of beating Hearns is just ******. It's highly arguable that in a twelve round WW fight, no one in the history of the sport could beat Tommy Hearns and trust me when I say Pac gets ****ed up and knocked out in about four rounds at the most. He does not survive this fight. Many others he would and against other ATG WW's he might even have a chance of winning. This fight though, he gets knocked out in.

The first hard right hand puts him on ***** street and then when Tommy goes nuts (as he does) he lands a the next one and Pac goes down and stays down. This particular fight is the worst possible match up at 147 for Pac without a doubt. He ate great fighters up at 147. Only Leonard could last the distance in a brutal war enough that Hearns exhausted himself and just didn't have the energy to last in a fight he was winning in.

The thing here is that you had a guy with every single weapon in the book, all at the very, very highest level that would give Pac the worst trouble of all. Counter puncher, freak right hand, jab and left hook to the body, all powerful enough to put anyone out. He also happened to be over six ****ing foot tall!

In Tommy Hearns you had a ridiculously highly skilled counter puncher, a guy who could box the socks off Ray Leonard, brawl with anyone and 98% of the time win, but most importantly; you had a guy who was insanely fast (just like Pac) with the boxing skill, speed, height and power to shame nearly every fighter fighting today not named Hopkins/Mayweather.

Please, don't bring up Hearns' chin. If you say something that ******, all you are doing is telling everyone here you have never watched Tommy Hearns. His chin was good and never gave him the slightest issue at 147 and 154. It wasn't until 160 and up that he ever had any problems and those problems were only with either the biggest punchers of the era at 160 in Barkley and arguably the greatest MW of all time in Hagler.

I ****ing hate this absurd threads.

Educate yourselves with a short highlight ****s.

[BennyST]

[EL_cano]

uhhh, when did Hearns fight at JWW, and where did he even ask about a fight at 140? And why would Pac win at 140 anyway? Cause you're a *******? That argument doesn't hold water, son. Pac loses to Hearns at any weight.

Please... I answered the WW question and i said Hearns win. Dont get your panties wet i mentioned Pac beats Hearns at JW because that is his Official weight. Its fantasy fight right i got my opinion you got yours... *** outta here Nastradamus..

Pac loses to anyweight Ya right.. If Manny is goin up weight to fight an ATG in Hearns he loses If Hearns go down to Pacs OFFICIAL weight he loses ***in half twit.

[whirlwind]

Hearns is too big for Pac. Pac is actually a 135 to 140 to the max fighter. His wins at 147 just proved to us the saying great little man will beat a very good big man but great little man against a great big man? Pac has no chance at all. Maybe if the are both 5'6'' in height, the same reach advantage fighting between 135-140. This will be a good fight while it last.

[EL_cano]

Tommy Hearns flat out obliterates Manny Pacquiao at 147. Don't get it twisted, Manny has not fight a live contender since 135. His win over Cotto was ok, but I give it a B win at best. Tommy Hearns has faster hands, better footwork, and WAY more power. I mean, the power isn't even close. Manny doesn't exactly have the best chin, even in lower weight classes he was getting knocked out and put down on his ass, and he has NEVER fought anybody that hits near as hard as Tommy Hearns.

If anybody thinks otherwise, you're probably a *******. Pac is good, but he should be matched up against guys like Roberto Duran.

Manny has not proven that he is any threat, or even a top contender at 147. He hasn't fought anybody.

He couldn't even knock out Clottey, and it took him 12 rounds to do in Cotto.

And don't ignore how many shots Clottey got in on Manny. For the few punches he threw, he sure did land quite a bit - he hit him at will, almost everytime he threw a punch it landed.

Tommy Hearns, KO inside of 5 rounds. This fight goes down Pipino Cuevas style.

Fight was done after RND 6. There was no need for Cotto to get punished till 12.