Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why are old school fighters from 1900-1960 rated ATG?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Medved View Post
    You idiot, I said MOST not ALL and Sugar I do agree with being in top 5 ATG.
    Eh No. Who are these "most" which are "out of shape drunks looking for a free meal ticket". In your first post you described most ATG's as this.

    Look at the fighters considered ATG from 1900-1960 and look at ALL of their OPPONENTS. MOST ARE JUST REGULAR FOLKS LOOKING FOR SOME BOOZE MONEY!
    Again which "most" are like you described. Please enlighten us.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by TheGreatA View Post
      Archie Moore was better than Harold Johnson. Do you think Jean Pascal is more skilled than Harold Johnson?









      Forget about Archie Moore, Pascal would not stand a chance against Harold even.


      Ah....Harold Johnson....One of boxing's most underrated fighters.Dude had a good skill set. IMO Johnson would decimate the any of the current light-heavyweights of our era.

      would pascal beat Johnson?...simple.....fuck no!!!

      -Scape

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by ubuntufighter View Post
        Here we have two "out of shape drunks looking for a free meal ticket":

        I'd never seen so much of the actual fight, just some snippets in a documentary of SRR where Carmen talks and comments. I know SRR beat him afterwards (if I recall) but Basilio was a badass, smaller than SRR and his hooks and body punching were sick.

        Comment


        • #94
          In fact, I want to see Carmen in the next FN. Where do we send our requests?

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP