Comments Thread For: WBC Shocker: Ward-Dirrell Approved, Not Froch-Abraham!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #41
    Woulda preferred it if it was Froch vs AA for a belt. It would make the final seem more prestigious being a unification bout. Either way, the winner is walkin out with both belts so I guess it shouldnt be a problem.

    Comment

    • bojangles1987
      bo jungle
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 41118
      • 1,326
      • 357
      • 63,028

      #42
      WTF? I don't get this. There's already a belt on the line.

      Comment

      • chris2142
        Amateur
        • Aug 2010
        • 29
        • 4
        • 0
        • 6,067

        #43
        are the fighting

        so is this fight going a head on the 25th september is it confirmed hope it is hard to pick a winner out of the two fights they are all good fighters now

        Comment

        • fastblack
          Banned
          • Aug 2010
          • 786
          • 69
          • 0
          • 933

          #44
          Fastblack

          Ah yes the honor and integrity of boxing and the astute decisions being made by the genious's who run the WBC. One can feel the sleeze oozing out of every pore and the stench coming down from the top. WBC-honor integrity and class. P U

          Comment

          • King Ju-Ju
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 6479
            • 147
            • 38
            • 6,758

            #45
            WBC should have awarded the Title 2 the Abraham-Froch fight. That way the winner between Ward-Dirrell fights the winner of that fight in a unification. Champion vs Champion.

            Comment

            • Sweet Jesus
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 11512
              • 568
              • 332
              • 13,576

              #46
              Originally posted by bojangles1987
              WTF? I don't get this. There's already a belt on the line.


              And now there are two titles on the line. It's a unification.

              Why the **** would Froch or Abraham be allowed to fight for the WBC belt before Dirrell when Dirrell ass ****d both of them.

              Are you actually arguing for two inferior fighters (Abraham, Froch) to fight for the belt over two superior fighters (Ward, Dirrell)?

              You are one dumb bitch.

              Comment

              • Sweet Jesus
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 11512
                • 568
                • 332
                • 13,576

                #47
                Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua
                WBC should have awarded the Title 2 the Abraham-Froch fight. That way the winner between Ward-Dirrell fights the winner of that fight in a unification. Champion vs Champion.
                Abraham and Froch are the definition of Euro bums. They do not deserve to even sniff a championship title.

                Comment

                • Hitman932
                  I LOVE Euro Fighters!!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 14910
                  • 1,180
                  • 836
                  • 28,259

                  #48
                  Originally posted by fastblack
                  Ah yes the honor and integrity of boxing and the astute decisions being made by the genious's who run the WBC. One can feel the sleeze oozing out of every pore and the stench coming down from the top. WBC-honor integrity and class. P U

                  I can't believe anyone has a problem with this decision. There is no reason that Froch and Abraham should fight for the title when both men lost their previous fights. Dirrell and Ward are both coming off victories, it makes more sense for them to fight for the WBC belt as well.

                  Plus, look at it from the WBC's point of view, they want to make sure that when this tourney is over that the very best fighter holds the WBC title.

                  It's pretty clear already that Dirrell and Ward are the 2 best fighters, and it's also clear that the two Euro's are going to ***** and moan about coming to the States after their fight.

                  So this is a case of the WBC protecting itself from a scenario where the Froch-Abraham winner refuses to travel to the USA for the final and leaves the WBC belt tied up in a legal battle.

                  Comment

                  • Mikhnienko
                    Lomachenko P4P#1
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 6056
                    • 413
                    • 473
                    • 13,966

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Hitman932
                    I can't believe anyone has a problem with this decision. There is no reason that Froch and Abraham should fight for the title when both men lost their previous fights. Dirrell and Ward are both coming off victories, it makes more sense for them to fight for the WBC belt as well.

                    Plus, look at it from the WBC's point of view, they want to make sure that when this tourney is over that the very best fighter holds the WBC title.

                    It's pretty clear already that Dirrell and Ward are the 2 best fighters, and it's also clear that the two Euro's are going to ***** and moan about coming to the States after their fight.

                    So this is a case of the WBC protecting itself from a scenario where the Froch-Abraham winner refuses to travel to the USA for the final and leaves the WBC belt tied up in a legal battle.
                    You're accusing the European fighters of being b1tches in regards to fighting in their hometowns or backing out of fights lol good one.

                    Comment

                    • Hitman932
                      I LOVE Euro Fighters!!
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 14910
                      • 1,180
                      • 836
                      • 28,259

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Mikhnienko
                      You're accusing the European fighters of being b1tches in regards to fighting in their hometowns or backing out of fights lol good one.
                      Never once, in my entire post, did I say anything about anyone backing out of fights.

                      You're a ****ing moron.

                      If you think that if Abraham beats Froch he won't cry like a baby about having to come back to the States after the way he was humiliated in Detroit, then you might be ******ed, not just a moron.

                      Sauerland has two fighters in this thing. Kessler and Abraham. They both got their asses kicked like girls in their fights in the US and Sauerland is so ****** he couldnt do anything but complain and make excuses instead of sucking it up like a man.

                      If Abraham had the WBC title then he would have no reason to travel, Sauerland would cry about how the US cheats his fighters (even though they lose every round) and he would go back to fighting bums in Germany like he did for the past 10 years.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP