manny pacquiao exposed for ducking opponents

[Khalid X]

What question? I was responding to your argument. LOL @ sidestep. Please.

Was hatton number 1 at 140...yes or no?

If not who was/should have been?

Very simple question to answer, unless you have an agenda and want to make a bunch of excuses.

[Pacquiao'd]

The only person I can say Floyd ducked was Johnston at 135 but at the same time I can understand that move. Now he should have fought Cotto and Margarito but chose not to. That's another story for another day.

The problem is these Floyd fans are using this as a defense mechanism. They are so use to hearing Floyd is a pvssy, ducker etc....that they tried to deflect it on a fighter like Manny.

I personally think it's sad as there shouldn't be any reason to tear another fighters career down to make yourself feel better about your favorite fighter.

he chose not to? shall i post Arums statement about floyd telling him he would fight both cheato and cotto for 10 mil. but arum said he wouldnt pay?

chose not to, puhlease

[tredh]

The only person I can say Floyd ducked was Johnston at 135 but at the same time I can understand that move. Now he should have fought Cotto and Margarito but chose not to. That's another story for another day.

The problem is these Floyd fans are using this as a defense mechanism. They are so use to hearing Floyd is a pvssy, ducker etc....that they tried to deflect it on a fighter like Manny.

I personally think it's sad as there shouldn't be any reason to tear another fighters career down to make yourself feel better about your favorite fighter.

There is basically no fighter in the history of boxing who fought everybody people thought they should have fought. I have never been high on Margarito even at his peak I thought he was no good just as I do now so I really saw no reason for that fight to happen.

I agree nobody should tear another down fighter for whatever reasons because neither fighter has been perfect according to the public with they choice of opponents through out they careers.

[Pacquiao'd]

Was hatton number 1 at 140...yes or no?

If not who was/should have been?

Very simple question to answer, unless you have an agenda and want to make a bunch of excuses.

hatton was coming of a devastating ko loss and slipped into a severe depression, yes or no?

hatton looked good against lazcano? yes or no?

he beat on a sloppy, feather fisted paulie, yes or no?

hatton was done, *******

[Khalid X]

he chose not to? shall i post Arums statement about floyd telling him he would fight both cheato and cotto for 10 mil. but arum said he wouldnt pay?

chose not to, puhlease

Did Floyd fight Cotto after Hatton....or did he chose to retire? Yes or No?

I thought I'd make this simple for you since your a complete dumbass you can't even get the definition of decade correct.

I didn't say duck....I said "chose not to", which are two different things.

[Khalid X]

hatton was coming of a devastating ko loss and slipped into a severe depression, yes or no?

hatton looked good against lazcano? yes or no?

he beat on a sloppy, feather fisted paulie, yes or no?

hatton was done, *******

Okay...who should have been number 1 at 140 then. What does fighting at 147 have to do with being the champ and #1 fighter at 140?

I know you will struggle with this because instead of paying attention to the sport, you rather fantasize about Floyd slam dunking his nutz in your mouth.

[IMDAZED]

Was hatton number 1 at 140...yes or no?

If not who was/should have been?

Very simple question to answer, unless you have an agenda and want to make a bunch of excuses.

LOL @ this f*g talking about someone having an agenda. With your Pac ****riding a**. I thought you were gonna switch your sn back to Top Rank? ****ing clown.

First, I answered your first question. Sure Hatton was #1. So was Pernell Whitaker in 1998.

Second, Timothy Bradley was the best fighter at 140 and still is.

[Khalid X]

There is basically no fighter in the history of boxing who fought everybody people thought they should have fought. I have never been high on Margarito even at his peak I thought he was no good just as I do now so I really saw no reason for that fight to happen.

I agree nobody should tear another down fighter for whatever reasons because neither fighter has been perfect according to the public with they choice of opponents through out they careers.

See this is what I don't get. I like Manny, Tyson, Hamed, Morales, Darchinyan, B-hop and a ton of other fighters. I don't have to tear down any fighter to make myself feel good about what my favorite fighter has accomplished.

Yeah I joke from time to time, but I don't make a career, like most posters on here do, of bashing one fighter to make their favorite fighter look better.

To me that is very feminine and b1tchmade.

[Khalid X]

Sure Hatton was #1.

Thank you. Fvkk all of that other bull**** you just spit to make yourself feel better (because you know what I said was true).

[IMDAZED]

Thank you. Fvkk all of that other bull**** you just spit to make yourself feel better (because you know what I said was true).

Of course you would take my sarcastic response and run with it. You know your b*tcha** can't deal with logic.