Same Peter Calls Wlad Klitschko or inan Samil Sam to Step up

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joeboxer
    Black Square
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2003
    • 3960
    • 260
    • 337
    • 12,264

    #21
    I think that Wlad would woop Peter's ass.

    Unless, that is, Wlad's trainer betrayed him and rubbed vasiline all over his body. Or down King put something in the water (I am aware Don doesnt' promote Peter). Or his hands are just to fast. Or Wlad gets all diabetic and ****. Or Wlad gets cut.

    Wlad = Only person will more Bull**** excuses than Tyson.

    Comment

    • Kid_Diamond
      Contender
      • Jul 2005
      • 146
      • 8
      • 0
      • 6,370

      #22
      Peter is big puncher and he can knocking out any heavyweight fighter.

      Comment

      • !! Mr. Soprano
        THE BOSS
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2005
        • 7106
        • 576
        • 2,446
        • 16,129

        #23
        Originally posted by Kid_Diamond
        Peter is big puncher and he can knocking out any heavyweight fighter.
        Really?

        I didn't know that

        Comment

        • Bozo_no no
          Palabras de Piedra
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 8906
          • 416
          • 496
          • 16,069

          #24
          Originally posted by paul750
          I wasn't saying he should be ranked anywhere near the top, i was just pointing out that he has beaten top fighters in the past, something which samuel peter has yet to to.


          Which has absolutly NOTHING to do with this current discussion.

          You're trying to say that Peter doesn't deserve to be in an eliminator.

          Well neither does Wlad Klitschko.

          There's a lot of guys who beat top fighters 5 years ago.

          Should they get shots at an eliminator?

          Don't talk about Wlad's quality wins.

          They occured LONG he was brutally KO'd by two poor fighters, and hasn't beaten anyone worth anything between or since.

          They hold NO relevence in this conversation.

          Comment

          • paul750
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2005
            • 7636
            • 334
            • 237
            • 16,264

            #25
            Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
            .

            .

            Well neither does Wlad Klitschko.

            There's a lot of guys who beat top fighters 5 years ago.
            Don't talk about Wlad's quality wins.

            and hasn't beaten anyone worth anything between or since.

            .
            Ray Mercer [yes he was shot but still Ray mercer]
            Jameel Mcline [legit top contender]
            Danell Nicholson [decent top 10-15 fighter]
            these wins all came within the last 3 years or so.
            peter has not beaten any of those calibre opponents.

            Comment

            • Bozo_no no
              Palabras de Piedra
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 8906
              • 416
              • 496
              • 16,069

              #26
              Originally posted by paul750
              Ray Mercer [yes he was shot but still Ray mercer]
              Jameel Mcline [legit top contender]
              Danell Nicholson [decent top 10-15 fighter]
              these wins all came within the last 3 years or so.
              peter has not beaten any of those calibre opponents.

              SINCE then, Wlad has been brutally knocked out by two fringe contenders.

              You are really drawing at straws here.

              With his undefeated streak, Peter is without question on par with Wlad at this point, who'd been brutally stopped twice in his last 6 fights (and is without a meaningful win inbetween or since).

              There is no logic in saying Peter is undeserving of being in an eliminator, but Wlad is.

              That's non sense.

              Comment

              • Riptor
                Interim Champion
                • May 2005
                • 608
                • 57
                • 86
                • 6,933

                #27
                right on Bozo. Wlad should fight peter and lose so that him being even acknowledged can finally come to an end. Wlad is shot and has had his jaw completely busted twice already. with a guy like peter who can hit ( and trust me I am not saying Peter is a great fighter) WLad wont last long. Neither Klitchko likes anyone who fires back at them. Remember Vitali backing away from featherfisted Burd when he threw punches back? or who can forget sanders turning WLad into jello pudding. when an opponent punches back and is not a hand picked runner/feinter, the Klitchkos dont like it.

                Comment

                • paul750
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 7636
                  • 334
                  • 237
                  • 16,264

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                  SINCE then, Wlad has been brutally knocked out by two fringe contenders.

                  You are really drawing at straws here.

                  With his undefeated streak, Peter is without question on par with Wlad at this point, who'd been brutally stopped twice in his last 6 fights (and is without a meaningful win inbetween or since).

                  There is no logic in saying Peter is undeserving of being in an eliminator, but Wlad is.

                  That's non sense.
                  even with those two bad losses he still has beaten a huge amount of top/fringe fighters, that still has to be considered, a fighter can have a 100-0-0 record but unless he beats someone of note it means nothing.

                  Comment

                  • Bozo_no no
                    Palabras de Piedra
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 8906
                    • 416
                    • 496
                    • 16,069

                    #29
                    Originally posted by paul750
                    even with those two bad losses he still has beaten a huge amount of top/fringe fighters, that still has to be considered, a fighter can have a 100-0-0 record but unless he beats someone of note it means nothing.

                    You don't know what you're talking about.

                    Sam is going to fight in an eliminator, Williamson is getting a title shot, yet according to you, Peter doesn't deserve it.

                    The part where you start to sound absolutly non sensical is where you start trying to assert that Peter doesn't deserve it, but Wlad Klitschko does.

                    You keep talking about things that happened BEFORE his KO losses.

                    Come off it.

                    There really is no criteria to get in an eliminator, and you're making a fuss for no reason.

                    Comment

                    • PBDS
                      RIP D
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2004
                      • 20408
                      • 1,763
                      • 4,643
                      • 33,018

                      #30
                      ....Boxrec now shows both Wlad/Brock and Peter/Sam as taking place on that sept 24th date at MSG. Looks like we will see both fights on the Cotto card then.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP