I think a fight between Wlad and Peter would be an awsome thing. I would have to give Wlad the edge. But in the end I dont think this fight will happen its high risk for both guys...
Same Peter Calls Wlad Klitschko or inan Samil Sam to Step up
Collapse
-
-
Peter stayed at the same position in ratings when the IBF switched Wlad and Williamson. Cause when they put Williamson at #3 and Wlad at #4, in order to **** up Wlad's lawsuit (thank God, can't blame them), Peter was #5. I'm assuming they ordered Wlad vs. Peter because they were pissed at Wlad for the lawsuit. They haven't officially, at least on their site, changed Wlad from #4 or Peter from #5, or Williamson from #3.Originally posted by pbds...In an article on ********* they are saying that Wlad/Brock is in negotiation for a possible fight on that September 24th date that was "supposed" to be Vitali's. Wlad wasn't named as Peter's box off partner until after Peter was talking about a fight for the top contender spot in the WBC in a fight with Sinan Sam. I would think those negotiations had started for that fight some time ago. Once again, who really knows what goes on with fight negotiations unless your in the room?
Yeah I know they'd already mentioned Peter vs. Sam in the WBC. Peter just fought like 2-3 weeks ago so who knows how serious any talks with Sam had gotten at that point. There's no guarantee that the winner of Wlad vs. Peter would be #1 contender, cause they have both #1 and #2 listed as Not Rated. So they'll probably want another box off after Peter and Wlad fight for the #1 spot.
Logically it'd be Valuev (#6) vs. Williamson (#3), but IBF isn't too high on logic.Comment
-
And Wladimir does? Please.Originally posted by gurupeter is more dangerous that brock, but brock is more skilled and should be rated higher off the win over mccline.... and really peter doesnt deserve to be in an eliminator off of beating nobodies....Comment
-
You're talking about old news, fool. Who is the last top heavyweight Wlad beat?Originally posted by paul750wlad has beaten proven top heavyweights, peter has not, wlad is getting a bad name because of his bad losses, but when he's on his game he's still a terrific operator.
And I know for a fact that they changed ****ing Moli's record. Cause when they first announced Wlad could be fighting that bum, I went on his record and the dude had losses in the double digits. Then, when it was official, I went back and the bum had like 2-3 losses.Comment
-
That's why drinking is illegal in most states until 21! That would explain your double vision!Originally posted by masterdirectorYou're talking about old news, fool. Who is the last top heavyweight Wlad beat?
And I know for a fact that they changed ****ing Moli's record. Cause when they first announced Wlad could be fighting that bum, I went on his record and the dude had losses in the double digits. Then, when it was official, I went back and the bum had like 2-3 losses.
Last edited by !! Mr. Soprano; 07-22-2005, 10:16 AM.Comment
-
And when was that? ****ing 2000 or so right? He has since been KTFO by Sanders and stopped against ****ing Brewster. Since Brewster, who the **** has Klitschko beat? Castillo? A blown up Cruiserweight? Williamson? The same guy that was KTFO in 1 round by ****ing Mesi? Ha, top guys for sure.Originally posted by paul750he gave chris byrd a boxing lesson, no one else has ever done that to byrd.
That's definitely call for a #1 ranking for the Heavyweight title.
Hell, I would love for Wlad to fight Byrd now. Don't get me wrong. Even though he doesn't deserve it, I want him to get it. I'd rather see Peter beat his ass truthfully, but I'd take him vs. Byrd 2. That'd be fine by my watch.Comment
-
I wasn't saying he should be ranked anywhere near the top, i was just pointing out that he has beaten top fighters in the past, something which samuel peter has yet to to.Originally posted by masterdirectorThat's definitely call for a #1 ranking for the Heavyweight title.
.Comment

Comment