I Love How Once A Boxer Loses He's Trash

[Megamasterking]

losing is one thing, and is not on its own an embarressing thing.

Dawson looked horrendous though, and didnt look like he even wanted to try to win at multiple points. Pascal was sitting there, gassed, with his hands at his waist right in front of him...what did he do? light jab, and back up.

geez...it would have been better for him to try his best and actually attempt to win in a KO loss. 'getting caught' is something that happens in boxing, even to the best. 'pussing out' against a mediocre fighter is something that a great fighter only does only when theyre shot and at the end of their career.

And there is no hate against Pascal ?

[PinoyZoi]

Funny how some *****s claim Ricky Hatton is a bum when Pacquiao fought him for his second lost. Now when Pascal lose, you guys are protecting him. Hypocrites?

[da beatdown]

SO, WHEN PASCAL LOST TO FROCH YOU HONESTLY SAID, RIGHT AFTER THE FIGHT, THAT PASCAL WOULD STILL BE A LHW CHAMPION THAT WOULD BEAT A # 6 P4P !!! i will look for some posts about that fight and how people saw Pascal after his only defeat...

U guys dont understand english very well, the point of the post is dont write a boxer off just because he loses.All the boxers I listed went on to accomplish great things, not that I predicted it....weirdos, I swear.....

[da beatdown]

This is why its such a bad loss, I mean Pascal IDC what anyone thinks is a B level fighter.

Dawson should have handled him without too much difficulty but just let an inferior fighter take his title and unbeaten mark without giving it his all.

I hope this loss woke him up and next time Chad shows us what he can really do.

Gotta disagree with you. I consider Cotto's loss to Pacquiao,a bad loss. Chad was pretty much being out hustled. Come round 11 and Dawson puts the peddle to the floor, gets results(had Pascal looking like he was ready for bed),gets butted, gets a loss for it. There are a couple questions that will get answered in the rematch, imo a bad loss has no doubts except if the loser is going to retire and things of that nature.

[Megamasterking]

U guys dont understand english very well, the point of the post is dont write a boxer off just because he loses.All the boxers I listed went on to accomplish great things, not that I predicted it....weirdos, I swear.....

I did understood your easy point, you didn't understand mine, my point is that people were saying and are still saying that Pascal is not a good fighter because he lost 1 fight against Froch. So, were you thinking that Pascal was a great fighter after is only defeat or you gave away on him after only 1 defeat...

[da beatdown]

I did understood your easy point, you didn't understand mine, my point is that people were saying and are still saying that Pascal is not a good fighter because he lost 1 fight against Froch. So, were you thinking that Pascal was a great fighter after is only defeat or you gave away on him after only 1 defeat...

I wasnt thinking anything of Pascal at the time of his lost to Froch besides "that was a pretty good fight"...But my personal opinion of him has nothing to do with what he's gone on to accomplish at 175.

[Shabba Rank$]

Welcome to boxingscene friend.

[da beatdown]

Welcome to boxingscene friend.

yeah these dudes...........I swear..........

[minasyan]

I will never turn against a fighter I love unless they do something really bad

Watch Abraham win the super 6

[Megamasterking]

So hats off to Jean Pascal, enjoy it while you can.

That's sarcasm, i don't think that a true boxing fan will respect that, Dawson is out of P4P "although i think he should have stayed there" and Pascal will enjoy it longer than you think, there's is no way that Dawson will improve enough to beat Pascal.

You said :Yeah these dudes...........I swear.......... "peeleft:

I'm not impressed... Man up...