How does Floyd have a better resume than Pacquiao?

[fugu]

dude, what does being the underdog have to do with anything? is it floyds fault that hes always been considered great and always win?

You said it was about challenging yourself. If you fight other fighters which the public view as a greater threat to you, then that is the definition of a challenge.

how has manny challenged himself more when all of his big fights have been against over the hill fighters, or roachs has made sure to beat them on the scale before getting on the ring?

Do you really think Mannys greatest W's are from Oscar and upwards? There was boxing before that.

im goign to ask you again, can manny make it through floyds resume and retain a zero when he couldnt even do it with his weaker resume?

This is irrelevant. Manny is not undefeated in his own career. That is not what builds legacy, don't get caught up in Floyds bull**** lines about being undefeated.
Floyd being undefeated is the worst thing that could have happened to him. If he did lose vs Castillo, he wouldn't be so worried about keeping an unblemished record, and he would seek out the biggest challenges that's out there.

Right now, he is banking on being undefeated as a way to claim hes the GOAT. That won't work.

Please try to not be so oriented on this Manny vs Floyd bull****. Don't behave similar to the *******s.

[fugu]

this only means that Mayweather has always been on top in the p4p rankings.

And that Manny has challenged himself more. It is not rocket science.

To me, a legacy is built on how good fighter you fought, not necessarily if you were expected to lose. If you are the best in the world you will never be considered an underdog.
I only used the argument because the poster claimed it was about a fighter challenging himself.

[Vegan101]

A coward like Gayweather should not be included in the P4P list much more as an ATG. What he did is an embarrassment to the sport of boxing by fighting blown up, old age, and past prime fighters just to maintain his undefeated and questionable record.

[Pacquiao'd]

You said it was about challenging yourself. If you fight other fighters which the public view as a greater threat to you, then that is the definition of a challenge.


Do you really think Mannys greatest W's are from Oscar and upwards? There was boxing before that.


This is irrelevant. Manny is not undefeated in his own career. That is not what builds legacy, don't get caught up in Floyds bull**** lines about being undefeated.
Floyd being undefeated is the worst thing that could have happened to him. If he did lose vs Castillo, he wouldn't be so worried about keeping an unblemished record, and he would seek out the biggest challenges that's out there.

Right now, he is banking on being undefeated as a way to claim hes the GOAT. That won't work.

Please try to not be so oriented on this Manny vs Floyd bull****. Don't behave similar to the *******s.

im talking about mannys resume from 130-140. his "WW" resume is a joke.

floyd blows through EM and MAB who wanted no parts of floyd. JMM taxed pacs ass twice.

so again, can pac get through floyds resume with a zero? you know he cant while floyd would whoop everyones ass on pacs resume, with ease.

so how canpacs resume be better than floyds?

floyd has been P4p ranks for 11 years while pac has been ranks for what, 3?

get out of here man, floyds resume>>>>>pacs

in the ring FLoyd whoops pacs ass. the time is nearing the hype train will come to an end., brutally

[fugu]

yesir,

I give up. I tried to explain my reasonings but you sound like a Floyd-fan version of Peyk-peyk or cungle.
If you don't agree fine.

And if you think Mayweather steamrolls Morales or Barrera you are crazy.

[Russian Crushin]

dude, what does being the underdog have to do with anything? is it floyds fault that hes always been considered great and always win?

how has manny challenged himself more when all of his big fights have been against over the hill fighters, or roachs has made sure to beat them on the scale before getting in the ring?

im goign to ask you again, can manny make it through floyds resume and retain a zero when he couldnt even do it with his weaker resume?

can floyd make it through mannys with a zero?

Honestly stop with the scales ****, Manny had 1 catchweight and it was 2 pounds. If your gonna complain about beating someone on the scales complain about a man that brings up another fighter up 11 pounds and still weighs over. That is beating someone on the scales

[Pacquiao'd]

yesir,

I give up. I tried to explain my reasonings but you sound like a Floyd-fan version of Peyk-peyk or cungle.
If you don't agree fine.

i dont agree.

floyd has the better opposition on his resume and it cant be argued.

you can talk abotu the names on pacs resume but that means **** when they dont present a challenge

[Franco2012]

A coward like Gayweather should not be included in the P4P list much more as an ATG. What he did is an embarrassment to the sport of boxing by fighting blown up, old age, and past prime fighters just to maintain his undefeated and questionable record.

Exactly!!!!!!!!

[southcentralcar]

And that Manny has challenged himself more. It is not rocket science.

To me, a legacy is built on how good fighter you fought, not necessarily if you were expected to lose. If you are the best in the world you will never be considered an underdog.
I only used the argument because the poster claimed it was about a fighter challenging himself.

current p4p standings you can find on the site:

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/view.php?pg=pound

[Pacquiao'd]

Honestly stop with the scales ****, Manny had 1 catchweight and it was 2 pounds. If your gonna complain about beating someone on the scales complain about a man that brings up another fighter up 11 pounds and still weighs over. That is beating someone on the scales

im not only talkign about catchweights guy. EM was one of the fighters who was beaten on the scale, no catchweight