Better FINISHER: Pacquiao or (PRIME 80s) Tyson

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bushbaby
    Wild Apache
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 23513
    • 727
    • 370
    • 32,078

    #11
    I will take a different aproach here,considering the weight Pacman began at,to ko welterweights or make former superstars quit on their stools at 147(Oscar)is amazing for his size!!

    But Tyson was a heavy weight with 1 punch ko power!!So Tyson easily may have been the best finisher ever!!

    But criticizing Pacman for not koing Marquez at his best weight is a little overboard!!To each his own I guess!!Especially when at least 1 of the critics favorite fighter couldn't ko a fat Marquez at a welterweight catchweight,when his fave fighter didn't & probably couldn't make the weight!!A welterweight should not go 12 rounds with a lightweight ever & if he does,his fans shouldn't criticize anyone who didn't ko that guy at his best weight!!

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 739
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #12
      Originally posted by jri9d0
      I'm a Pac fan, but I even think Tito was a better finisher then Manny was.
      That is because you're a bigger Tito fan.





































































      But, who can blame you

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 739
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #13
        What really helped Tyson finishing skills is that he had true one punch KO power while Doesn't and never did. He stopped you most of the time by speed and punch accumulation.

        Comment

        • B.U.R.N.E.R
          ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 30197
          • 1,346
          • 400
          • 47,475

          #14
          Originally posted by Di Bushbaby
          I will take a different aproach here,considering the weight Pacman began at,to ko welterweights or make former superstars quit on their stools at 147(Oscar)is amazing for his size!!

          But Tyson was a heavy weight with 1 punch ko power!!So Tyson easily may have been the best finisher ever!!

          But criticizing Pacman for not koing Marquez at his best weight is a little overboard!!To each his own I guess!!Especially when at least 1 of the critics favorite fighter couldn't ko a fat Marquez at a welterweight catchweight,when his fave fighter didn't & probably couldn't make the weight!!A welterweight should not go 12 rounds with a lightweight ever & if he does,his fans shouldn't criticize anyone who didn't ko that guy at his best weight!!
          No one ever claimed Floyd is a great finisher.

          And no one ever claimed he hit harder than Pacquiao.

          Comment

          • Khalid X
            The Truth *********
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 11976
            • 691
            • 531
            • 20,762

            #15
            Originally posted by No Ceilings
            When Mike Tyson drops a guy 3 times in one round and doesnt KO him ever. Even if they fight twice.

            Considering that didnt happen. Mentioning Pac with Tyson is a joke.
            Damn you are obsessed with Manny.

            Comment

            • SlickTurtle
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Apr 2010
              • 503
              • 67
              • 59
              • 6,846

              #16
              Originally posted by -The Game-
              Is the thread starter for real...

              Pac couldn't finish off clottey, cotto(if it wasnt for the ref being gay), marquez X2 and David diaz.

              And you want to compare his finishing skills to TYson......

              TS is a huge *****... hes trying to expose the *******s i suppose

              Comment

              • B.U.R.N.E.R
                ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 30197
                • 1,346
                • 400
                • 47,475

                #17
                Originally posted by Mr. Copeland
                Damn you are obsessed with Manny.
                Im responding to the topic.

                I also responded to SEVERAL other topics today. How am I obsessed because I dont think hes a better finisher than Michael Gerard Tyson?

                Comment

                • jrosales13
                  undisputed champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 32632
                  • 739
                  • 763
                  • 40,023

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Di Bushbaby
                  I will take a different aproach here,considering the weight Pacman began at,to ko welterweights or make former superstars quit on their stools at 147(Oscar)is amazing for his size!!

                  But Tyson was a heavy weight with 1 punch ko power!!So Tyson easily may have been the best finisher ever!!

                  But criticizing Pacman for not koing Marquez at his best weight is a little overboard!!To each his own I guess!!Especially when at least 1 of the critics favorite fighter couldn't ko a fat Marquez at a welterweight catchweight,when his fave fighter didn't & probably couldn't make the weight!!A welterweight should not go 12 rounds with a lightweight ever & if he does,his fans shouldn't criticize anyone who didn't ko that guy at his best weight!!
                  Exactly, but like you said to each is own...

                  Good post

                  Comment

                  • B.U.R.N.E.R
                    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 30197
                    • 1,346
                    • 400
                    • 47,475

                    #19
                    So because Floyd didnt stop Marquez and Pacquiao also didnt stop him means we cant use that as an example to say how PACQUIO is not a BETTER finisher than a 1980's Mike Tyson? A guy who had 33 KO's in the 80's most not going past 5 rounds?

                    The fuck?


                    Somebody explain that logic and what Floyd has to do with Pac not being a better finisher than Tyson.

                    Comment

                    • Bushbaby
                      Wild Apache
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 23513
                      • 727
                      • 370
                      • 32,078

                      #20
                      Originally posted by No Ceilings
                      No one ever claimed Floyd is a great finisher.

                      And no one ever claimed he hit harder than Pacquiao.
                      Burner,homey,are U guilty??I never said anything about who finishes better between the 2, Why U felt U had to respond??Lol!!Marquez was great at his lower weights,I was just evening out the playing field,because some guys were criticizing Manny for not koing a prime version of the all time great who is Marquez,that's all!!I was just sayin they shouldn't when their man couldn't at their man's weight,never mentioned U though!!Lol!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP