Black and white once again you forget how "well" he performed. It's not my fault your brain can't comprehend critical thinking. Oh and Pac's last 3 of 4 fights have been at what division again?
Black and white with you... you forget... that he "lost".
Every single big fight he has ever been in he has lost... every single one.
And don't start throwing personal insults towards me, keep it boxing related.
I can throw the black and white claim right back in your face.
Junior Witter was the WBC Jr WW Champion, and he went to the UK to beat him in his own backyard. He has wins over world class opponents, which you said he hasn't.. which isn't true.
I've seen all Clotteys fights, so you don't get any extra credit because you've "seen" them.
In every single "BIG" fight Clottey has lost, and that fact cannot be denied. The Cotto fight was there for the taking and he still couldn't get it done, because he couldn't pull the trigger enough. Same case as has always been with Clottey.
Bradley is in fact the JR WW champion and #1 ranked fighter in the division. Pacquiao is the ring 140lb champion. That fight is more deserving than Clottey... who's best win is Zab Judah, not mentioning coming off a loss in his very last fight.
The MAIN point is this.
If Joshua Clottey was not with Bob Arum, Joshua Clottey would have NEVER fought Pacquiao.
This is the only thing that needs to be said. Everything else is icing on the cake.
He didn't fight on even terms because he lost. Being competitive is not the same as winning. He lost those fights and he found a way to do it. It's a pattern with Clottey.
Black and white with you... you forget... that he "lost".
Every single big fight he has ever been in he has lost... every single one.
And don't start throwing personal insults towards me, keep it boxing related.
And Bradley hasn't even "had" that big fight yet so how exactley does that make him more qualified than Clottey? I'm not thinking black and white because "gasp" I'm looking at details.
Tweet
Comment