Hair testing is the way to go for testing PEDs'

[Wreckless]

When are some people going to realise that some PEDs are only detectable in blood?

You're joking right? Blood testing more accurate than DNA/Hair testing? LOL

[Spoon23]

listen ******...i'm not anything close to what you pissflaps on here call a "*****". just cuz one fighter in the sport cry's about blood testing...we should now be on a crusade to appease him.

Then learn to comprehend have more reading skills.. if you don't want to be associated of being a *****. Coz *****s are blind fans who would do anything to worship there god floyd gayweather lol..

In the first place blood testing is not part of testing in boxing so why are you in the crusade of blood testing?

So if your not a ***** there are non evasive test that will not harm a fighter during training and your not up for it? Same results different procedure. Harmless procedure to put it simply.. Don't you think that is the way to go?

Non-evasive and still in the persuit of finding ped's. Isn't that logical?

If you say no. then it's obvious your a ***** lol, coz *****s have no reasoning or common sense at all lol.. There beyond logic in there small world of tards hehe.. So are you 1??

[Rick Grimes]

You're joking right? Blood testing more accurate than DNA/Hair testing? LOL

If hair testing was more accurate don't you think that WADA and all the Olympic drug testing organizations would be using it? They take blood because it is more accurate. Get a ****ing brain before you try to act smart.

[Wreckless]

If hair testing was more accurate don't you think that WADA and all the Olympic drug testing organizations would be using it? They take blood because it is more accurate. Get a ****ing brain before you try to act smart.

That's your reasoning? haha look idiot, do you know how long it takes for the results to come back? It takes a hell of a lot longer to get the results than blood, but it is infinite times more accurate.

[ThePunchingBag]

If hair testing was more accurate don't you think that WADA and all the Olympic drug testing organizations would be using it? They take blood because it is more accurate. Get a ****ing brain before you try to act smart.

Wrong.

Blood testing is cheaper and the results come back faster.

DNA/Hair testing is more accurate, less intrusive, but the results take awhile to process.

Each has their pros and cons.

WADA only sees the $, so it goes for the cheaper testing procedure.

[Spoon23]

If hair testing was more accurate don't you think that WADA and all the Olympic drug testing organizations would be using it? They take blood because it is more accurate. Get a ****ing brain before you try to act smart.

naah they not implementing it coz it takes time to review the results. But hair is evidence if a fighter are taking peds. Those samples can be locked in a vault and bring out for evidence even if it takes months or even years. Therefore if a fighter cheats he will get caught, only difference is it takes time to get results.

Still would you cheat knowing the results will still come later? No right so they should implement this. They can get hairs samples everyday till the day of the fight.

[Rick Grimes]

That's your reasoning? haha look idiot, do you know how long it takes for the results to come back? It takes a hell of a lot longer to get the results than blood, but it is infinite times more accurate.

and? Don't you think that they would take hair too if it is more accurate?

[| THE KING |]

If hair testing was more accurate don't you think that WADA and all the Olympic drug testing organizations would be using it? They take blood because it is more accurate. Get a ****ing brain before you try to act smart.

You really should research a topic you are obviously unsure of. LOL!

[Mr. Ryan]

so you think fighters should risk their health in the ring against someone with an unnatural advantage because that person will be shamed after the fact?

...what's the big deal with blood testing again?

Under these sort of su****ions, should all fights that previously took place without blood testing leading up to the match be rendered su****ious and invalidated? lol

For the record, I am in favor of stricter drug testing policies, but not for only one fighter/fight. I think that if they use it for the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight then they should use it for every fight hereafter.

[Real King Kong]

Then learn to comprehend have more reading skills.. if you don't want to be associated of being a *****. Coz *****s are blind fans who would do anything to worship there god floyd gayweather lol..

In the first place blood testing is not part of testing in boxing so why are you in the crusade of blood testing?

So if your not a ***** there are non evasive test that will not harm a fighter during training and your not up for it? Same results different procedure. Harmless procedure to put it simply.. Don't you think that is the way to go?

Non-evasive and still in the persuit of finding ped's. Isn't that logical?

If you say no. then it's obvious your a ***** lol, coz *****s have no reasoning or common sense at all lol.. There beyond logic in there small world of tards hehe.. So are you 1??

if you are going to implement new testing it should be a method that can catch fighters before they fight...and at the very least provide a deterrent by being completely random. what good is getting results 2 weeks after the fight if a guy gets seriously hurt in the ring? its quite clear that you're a pacquiao nutthugger or else you would think blood testing is no big deal...like the rest of the world.