I don't know. I thought Pac clearly avoided him. And using the "not his weight class" excuse is lame. Morales didn't want to go back to 130 either. Raheem kicked Morales' ass and should've ended any talk of a rematch. It didn't. Even worse, Pacquiao decided to fight the guy a third time. No defending it.
Why didnt pac ever fight zahir raheem?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Pac should of fought Raheem or Guzman instead of the third fight with Morales. The question is should he have made Raheem go down to 130?Comment
-
Comment
-
No one would be saying that. I just don't understand this revisionist history crap. Why can't you see things objectively for once? Manny got crap for avoiding Raheem and deservedly so. Why would people say he was ducking a clearly shot Morales? No one even considered a trilogy until Arum brought it up. You act like the public was clamoring for it or something
.
Comment
-
Nah, I don't think so. There was no need for the third fight IMO. He proved what he had to prove in the rematch. I have no problem with the rematch happening even though Morales lost to Raheem. Pac wanted to avenge his lost nothing wrong with that at all. People can hate all they want with that but nothing wrong with trying to get payback. But, the third fight was just unnecessary and total crap.Comment
-
Everyone knows Manny only fights weight drained, B-level fighters, shot and past prime fighters instead of fighting the best.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment