Why didnt pac ever fight zahir raheem?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The_Demon
    Big dog
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 13604
    • 1,354
    • 888
    • 22,971

    #141
    Originally posted by IMDAZED
    Not every two fights deserves a trilogy. Did Montell Griffin and Roy Jones have one? Come on, man. Even you know this better than anyone else because Pac shut down a third match with Marquez like RIGHT AFTER they fought a second time. No need for a trilogy then? But we need one for a fighter at the end of his rope? Try again.

    Do you seriously argue this way? You can't use hindsight in this scenario. At all.


    Pac wasn't p4p #1 then and Rahim hadn't fought either at the time. And I don't think Freitas beat him anyway.

    LOL. That's like someone saying, "Do you really think Floyd should've fought Castillo? The guy got KO'ed in four by Hatton and barelys c****d by Ngoudjo. Be serious.

    OWNED!

    hhhh

    Comment

    • pistol whip
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 8645
      • 255
      • 4
      • 15,040

      #142
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      Not every two fights deserves a trilogy. Did Montell Griffin and Roy Jones have one? Come on, man. Even you know this better than anyone else because Pac shut down a third match with Marquez like RIGHT AFTER they fought a second time. No need for a trilogy then? But we need one for a fighter at the end of his rope? Try again.

      Do you seriously argue this way? You can't use hindsight in this scenario. At all.


      Pac wasn't p4p #1 then and Rahim hadn't fought either at the time. And I don't think Freitas beat him anyway.

      LOL. That's like someone saying, "Do you really think Floyd should've fought Castillo? The guy got KO'ed in four by Hatton and barelys c****d by Ngoudjo. Be serious.

      Hind sight is always 20/20 ever heard of that phrase? It applys to you perfectly because not until the last 3 or 4 months have i ever heard anyone ever make a case for this fight. None!!! So if picking out any b- fighter you can to somehow downplay Pac's accomplishments is gonna make you feel like you have justified your views on Pac more power to you because i find your argument to be so desperate that it makes me chuckle a bit. And I don't even really like pac myself thats the funny part.


      Ok Pac wasn't #1 he was #2 or 3# at the most excuse me LOL!!! And you can't compare castillo to Raheem because Castillo was the ***ing LW champion while Raheem beat Morales a fighter who according to you was at the end of his rope. Please stop with the contradictions I beg you!
      Last edited by pistol whip; 06-17-2010, 05:57 PM.

      Comment

      • pistol whip
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 8645
        • 255
        • 4
        • 15,040

        #143
        Originally posted by Dubstep Demon
        I dont read well

        hhhh

        Fixed that for you!

        Comment

        • Boss2k10
          Banned
          • Jun 2010
          • 250
          • 49
          • 9
          • 313

          #144
          Originally posted by pistol whip
          So you are saying any slick boxer could beat pac? Jesus ***ing christ you are ******!!!
          This version of Pac was a one handed fighter who would have been outboxed by Raheem.

          The new and improved Pac who was meant to have progressed alot in 4 years still got outboxed by an older smaller JMM.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP