Why didnt pac ever fight zahir raheem?
Collapse
-
Not every two fights deserves a trilogy. Did Montell Griffin and Roy Jones have one? Come on, man. Even you know this better than anyone else because Pac shut down a third match with Marquez like RIGHT AFTER they fought a second time. No need for a trilogy then? But we need one for a fighter at the end of his rope? Try again.
Do you seriously argue this way? You can't use hindsight in this scenario. At all.
Pac wasn't p4p #1 then and Rahim hadn't fought either at the time. And I don't think Freitas beat him anyway.
LOL. That's like someone saying, "Do you really think Floyd should've fought Castillo? The guy got KO'ed in four by Hatton and barelys c****d by Ngoudjo. Be serious.
Hind sight is always 20/20 ever heard of that phrase? It applys to you perfectly because not until the last 3 or 4 months have i ever heard anyone ever make a case for this fight. None!!! So if picking out any b- fighter you can to somehow downplay Pac's accomplishments is gonna make you feel like you have justified your views on Pac more power to you because i find your argument to be so desperate that it makes me chuckle a bit. And I don't even really like pac myself thats the funny part.
Ok Pac wasn't #1 he was #2 or 3# at the most excuse me LOL!!! And you can't compare castillo to Raheem because Castillo was the ***ing LW champion while Raheem beat Morales a fighter who according to you was at the end of his rope. Please stop with the contradictions I beg you!Last edited by pistol whip; 06-17-2010, 05:57 PM.Comment
-
-
This version of Pac was a one handed fighter who would have been outboxed by Raheem.
The new and improved Pac who was meant to have progressed alot in 4 years still got outboxed by an older smaller JMM.Comment
Comment