Comments Thread For: Merchant: Mayweather-Pacquiao, Klitschko-Haye Top List

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steelhammer2011
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 2155
    • 293
    • 414
    • 2,338

    #31
    Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua
    lmfao, itll happen man. dont worry. and when it does david haye will ko wladimir.
    Keep dreaming.

    Haye knows he would get destroyed by either Klitschko. That's why he pussied out 3 times and has gone into hiding. He's a pathetic coward and a disgrace to boxing.

    Comment

    • Mr Reality
      Interim Champion
      • Nov 2009
      • 653
      • 28
      • 0
      • 6,755

      #32
      I would also like to see Cotto vs Margarito II. That should be a heck of a fight. Cotto would have a chance to redeem himself against Margarito and Margarito would have a chance to prove the first fight was not a fluke or whatever you might want to say.

      Comment

      • WalkerSmith1921
        Contender
        • Feb 2010
        • 333
        • 21
        • 0
        • 6,461

        #33
        Originally posted by Mr Reality
        Mayweather was a good sport and gave Castillo another shot. He did not leave any doubt who had won that fight, No unfinished business left behind unlike Pacquiao vs Marquez. Just the facts.
        I couldn't have said it better myself dude; well said. Both of Pacquiao/Marquez fights were close and debatable; but did Manny ever give the guy a rematch to see who was truly the best? Not

        Comment

        • WalkerSmith1921
          Contender
          • Feb 2010
          • 333
          • 21
          • 0
          • 6,461

          #34
          Originally posted by jrosales13
          Well in that case, how many of them have Cotto fought?
          You can had Manny to this list as well. How many have he fought in their prime and at their weight? Delahoya=No (Plus he was weight-drained and a part time fighter,) Cotto=No (weight-drained and lost his last few fights with one debatable win) Diaz=No (He was the weakest link in his division, plus he was very limited skillwise) Hatton=No (He fought face-first and was koed by Mayweather which took his confidence away but it probably didn't matter in Hatton's case) Marquez=YES (And everybody saw the difference and that's why Marquez will never get a third chance) Barrera=No (Old and been through too many wars Morales=No (same reason as Barrera; old and been through too many wars)!! My take on Manny Pacquiao is that he really is a good fighter but far from great. Just been fed too many give mes. in my personal opinion!!!

          Comment

          • Mr Reality
            Interim Champion
            • Nov 2009
            • 653
            • 28
            • 0
            • 6,755

            #35
            Originally posted by WalkerSmith1921
            I couldn't have said it better myself dude; well said. Both of Pacquiao/Marquez fights were close and debatable; but did Manny ever give the guy a rematch to see who was truly the best? Not
            True. Both fights could have gone either way. Just don't understand why these jokers left fight fans hanging when that was the fight that should have been made & not D Diaz vs Pacquiao.

            Lost huge respect for Team Pacquiao & Arum/Top Rank after this wimpy career decision.

            Comment

            • Mr Reality
              Interim Champion
              • Nov 2009
              • 653
              • 28
              • 0
              • 6,755

              #36
              Originally posted by WalkerSmith1921
              You can had Manny to this list as well. How many have he fought in their prime and at their weight? Delahoya=No (Plus he was weight-drained and a part time fighter,) Cotto=No (weight-drained and lost his last few fights with one debatable win) Diaz=No (He was the weakest link in his division, plus he was very limited skillwise) Hatton=No (He fought face-first and was koed by Mayweather which took his confidence away but it probably didn't matter in Hatton's case) Marquez=YES (And everybody saw the difference and that's why Marquez will never get a third chance) Barrera=No (Old and been through too many wars Morales=No (same reason as Barrera; old and been through too many wars)!! My take on Manny Pacquiao is that he really is a good fighter but far from great. Just been fed too many give mes. in my personal opinion!!!
              Funny thing about Team Pac is that they would not fight Morales at a higher weight or CATCHWEIGHT for Morales vs Pac II, because they knew that Morales was having trouble making weight. Yet they used a catchweigh to fight for the WW title and have always tried to use the weight factor to tilt fights or negotiations in his favor.

              Comment

              • antrob
                Undisputed Champion
                • Jun 2009
                • 1236
                • 53
                • 88
                • 7,403

                #37
                Why did boxing scene have to mention what abc titles would be up for grabs. If you take away them titles it doesn't make them matches any less fascinating.

                Comment

                • antrob
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 1236
                  • 53
                  • 88
                  • 7,403

                  #38
                  Originally posted by WalkerSmith1921
                  You can had Manny to this list as well. How many have he fought in their prime and at their weight? Delahoya=No (Plus he was weight-drained and a part time fighter,) Cotto=No (weight-drained and lost his last few fights with one debatable win) Diaz=No (He was the weakest link in his division, plus he was very limited skillwise) Hatton=No (He fought face-first and was koed by Mayweather which took his confidence away but it probably didn't matter in Hatton's case) Marquez=YES (And everybody saw the difference and that's why Marquez will never get a third chance) Barrera=No (Old and been through too many wars Morales=No (same reason as Barrera; old and been through too many wars)!! My take on Manny Pacquiao is that he really is a good fighter but far from great. Just been fed too many give mes. in my personal opinion!!!
                  Barrera was in his prime for the first encounter with Pacquiao. He just had a bunch of excuses after he lost. And no i'm not a "*******" or a "*****".

                  Comment

                  • Mr Reality
                    Interim Champion
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 653
                    • 28
                    • 0
                    • 6,755

                    #39
                    Originally posted by antrob
                    Barrera was in his prime for the first encounter with Pacquiao. He just had a bunch of excuses after he lost. And no i'm not a "*******" or a "*****".
                    Sure, he was the one coming off a fight vs the weight drained already defeated Morales that couldn't make weight .
                    Last edited by Mr Reality; 06-12-2010, 03:32 AM.

                    Comment

                    • a08
                      Banned
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 207
                      • 18
                      • 17
                      • 273

                      #40
                      For me,Wlad vs. Gay fight is No.1,because there will be a devastating kayo of wba diva and unification of all the major titles by Klichko brothers.Pac vs. May is No.2 for me, because there will be 12 boring technical rounds.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP