Comments Thread For: Merchant: Mayweather-Pacquiao, Klitschko-Haye Top List
Collapse
-
-
I would also like to see Cotto vs Margarito II. That should be a heck of a fight. Cotto would have a chance to redeem himself against Margarito and Margarito would have a chance to prove the first fight was not a fluke or whatever you might want to say.
Comment
-
I couldn't have said it better myself dude; well said. Both of Pacquiao/Marquez fights were close and debatable; but did Manny ever give the guy a rematch to see who was truly the best? NotComment
-
You can had Manny to this list as well. How many have he fought in their prime and at their weight? Delahoya=No (Plus he was weight-drained and a part time fighter,) Cotto=No (weight-drained and lost his last few fights with one debatable win) Diaz=No (He was the weakest link in his division, plus he was very limited skillwise) Hatton=No (He fought face-first and was koed by Mayweather which took his confidence away but it probably didn't matter in Hatton's case) Marquez=YES (And everybody saw the difference and that's why Marquez will never get a third chance) Barrera=No (Old and been through too many wars Morales=No (same reason as Barrera; old and been through too many wars)!! My take on Manny Pacquiao is that he really is a good fighter but far from great. Just been fed too many give mes. in my personal opinion!!!Comment
-
True. Both fights could have gone either way. Just don't understand why these jokers left fight fans hanging when that was the fight that should have been made & not D Diaz vs Pacquiao.
Lost huge respect for Team Pacquiao & Arum/Top Rank after this wimpy career decision.
Comment
-
Funny thing about Team Pac is that they would not fight Morales at a higher weight or CATCHWEIGHT for Morales vs Pac II, because they knew that Morales was having trouble making weight. Yet they used a catchweigh to fight for the WW title and have always tried to use the weight factor to tilt fights or negotiations in his favor.You can had Manny to this list as well. How many have he fought in their prime and at their weight? Delahoya=No (Plus he was weight-drained and a part time fighter,) Cotto=No (weight-drained and lost his last few fights with one debatable win) Diaz=No (He was the weakest link in his division, plus he was very limited skillwise) Hatton=No (He fought face-first and was koed by Mayweather which took his confidence away but it probably didn't matter in Hatton's case) Marquez=YES (And everybody saw the difference and that's why Marquez will never get a third chance) Barrera=No (Old and been through too many wars Morales=No (same reason as Barrera; old and been through too many wars)!! My take on Manny Pacquiao is that he really is a good fighter but far from great. Just been fed too many give mes. in my personal opinion!!!
Comment
-
Barrera was in his prime for the first encounter with Pacquiao. He just had a bunch of excuses after he lost. And no i'm not a "*******" or a "*****".You can had Manny to this list as well. How many have he fought in their prime and at their weight? Delahoya=No (Plus he was weight-drained and a part time fighter,) Cotto=No (weight-drained and lost his last few fights with one debatable win) Diaz=No (He was the weakest link in his division, plus he was very limited skillwise) Hatton=No (He fought face-first and was koed by Mayweather which took his confidence away but it probably didn't matter in Hatton's case) Marquez=YES (And everybody saw the difference and that's why Marquez will never get a third chance) Barrera=No (Old and been through too many wars Morales=No (same reason as Barrera; old and been through too many wars)!! My take on Manny Pacquiao is that he really is a good fighter but far from great. Just been fed too many give mes. in my personal opinion!!!Comment
-
Comment