Hopkins is probably the most overrated fighter ever.
I just don't see HOPKINS as an A.T.G.
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I'm black you idiot.

Come on then, tell me who the ' best ' at MW he beat.
' As well as KOing the WW he fought '.
Wow! He KOed a WW at MW, amazing!
Comment
-
if he ko'd a "welterweight" even though the "welterweight" had the wba middleweight belt then do u think hopkins pavlik was fair? i mean hopkins is a true middleweight and so is pavlik by ur logic.Comment
-
He is top 10 middleweight of all time!
I dont like him,but you need to give him props,he was 41 when he fought JT without USADA tests!Comment
-
Yeah then why do you hate on hopkins? Hopkins is a don man.
Tito Trinidad was an elite MW just because he fought at WW doesnt mean he wasnt a beast at MW. You see his KO win over Joppy?
Record middleweight defences says it all, his era was as good as Monzons or Haglers.
He Koed DLH at 156 which is pretty impressive. Beat Tarver who was the man at LHW.Comment
-
Comment
-
I stopped reading at King Of Headbutts and boring. If you're gonna make case against something, then have well prepared argument to present, instead of nonsense hater rambling.
Next.Comment
-
Hatton was a decent boxer and put on some entertaining fights. He was just never on that ' elite ' level. Definitely a solid B+ fighter though.
Haye is a fighter with a style that works well at heavyweight. Although it's a shame his chin isn't much better but he's got good enough reflexes at the moment.
Both of which aren't overrated. If anything Hatton is started to become underrated. No one has made any seriously absurd claims about either fighter so I cannot see how they're overrated?
Comment
Comment