**2001 Diego Corrales vs 2007 Manny Pacquiao @130**
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I think 2001 chico has the edge because of his size, determination, and his ability to beat fighters who aren't scared to get hit and fight toe to toe.
Also, manny pacquiao is very weak in the pocket and chico had some monster short hooks and uppercuts on the inside.
And 2007 Manny was very 1 dimensional and didn't have anywhere near as much ring generalship as he does now.
Anything could have happened though.. this is boxing. On any given night I think either one could have knocked out the other.. Still I give the edge to 2001 Chico.Last edited by DARKSEID; 05-11-2010, 12:47 PM.Comment
-
The reason why Packy is a ATG and Fighter Of The Decade: Corrales was a big 130lbs in 2001 while Pacquiao was a 122lbrs. Pac moved all the way up to 147lbs where Corrales can't even hold a candle there. Packy is doing the impossible ( E Stewart said Pac has no business at 147 but he's so great he's beating guys there ).Comment
-
The reason why Packy is a ATG and Fighter Of The Decade: Corrales was a big 130lbs in 2001 while Pacquiao was a 122lbrs. Pac moved all the way up to 147lbs where Corrales can't even hold a candle there. Packy is doing the impossible ( E Stewart said Pac has no business at 147 but he's so great he's beating guys there ).Comment
-
Comment
-
Jrosales your're wasting your time with Pacman777.
He started watching boxing in 2008 and had no idea who Floyd was as of May 2, 2009.
Last edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 05-11-2010, 04:23 PM.Comment
Comment