**2001 Diego Corrales vs 2007 Manny Pacquiao @130**

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nujabes77
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 8359
    • 535
    • 354
    • 16,443

    #21
    Originally posted by jrosales13
    Ok and I am not dis*****g those facts at all. He also beat Ledwaba on 3 week notice which is such an underrated win in this boards. Some of them forget how good Ledwaba was. And, how highly touted he was at the time...

    But, Pac would NOT have beaten Corrales with just the left hand. Pac prior 2007 does not beat Corrales. Now post 2007 I can see a case being made. Because he had better balance, improved defense and now a right hand that was just as dangerous as the left



    barrera, morales and marquez >>> coralles

    Comment

    • PH|L
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Apr 2010
      • 919
      • 19
      • 10
      • 1,040

      #22
      Originally posted by No Ceilings
      Im going to go out on a limb and say that I honeslty think people only seen Corralles fight Floyd.
      In 2001, I've only seen Corrales fight Floyd.

      Comment

      • SoldierWarrior
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 3804
        • 86
        • 113
        • 10,191

        #23
        Originally posted by No Ceilings
        Im going to go out on a limb and say that I honeslty think people only seen Corralles fight Floyd.
        Yes, because us boxing fans definitely missed Corrales big fight against Castillo.

        Comment

        • nujabes77
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 8359
          • 535
          • 354
          • 16,443

          #24
          manny can never win fantasy fight on here on nsb...


          coralles > manny? lmao @ these clowns

          Comment

          • DARKSEID
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 17578
            • 962
            • 512
            • 43,940

            #25
            I think 2001 chico has the edge because of his size, determination, and his ability to beat fighters who aren't scared to get hit and fight toe to toe.

            Also, manny pacquiao is very weak in the pocket and chico had some monster short hooks and uppercuts on the inside.

            And 2007 Manny was very 1 dimensional and didn't have anywhere near as much ring generalship as he does now.

            Anything could have happened though.. this is boxing. On any given night I think either one could have knocked out the other.. Still I give the edge to 2001 Chico.
            Last edited by DARKSEID; 05-11-2010, 12:47 PM.

            Comment

            • ModernTalking
              Cuckold **** Connoisseur
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 6621
              • 272
              • 0
              • 13,009

              #26
              The reason why Packy is a ATG and Fighter Of The Decade: Corrales was a big 130lbs in 2001 while Pacquiao was a 122lbrs. Pac moved all the way up to 147lbs where Corrales can't even hold a candle there. Packy is doing the impossible ( E Stewart said Pac has no business at 147 but he's so great he's beating guys there ).

              Comment

              • Doctor_Tenma
                Monster
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 33313
                • 1,327
                • 1,249
                • 58,127

                #27
                Originally posted by ModernTalking
                The reason why Packy is a ATG and Fighter Of The Decade: Corrales was a big 130lbs in 2001 while Pacquiao was a 122lbrs. Pac moved all the way up to 147lbs where Corrales can't even hold a candle there. Packy is doing the impossible ( E Stewart said Pac has no business at 147 but he's so great he's beating guys there ).
                Some people don't have the athleticism to move up in weight. Who is to say Corrales wouldn't have been dominant at Jr WW? He was clearly out of his element at 147.

                Comment

                • V.WEBB
                  CBVM
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 14327
                  • 621
                  • 174
                  • 21,453

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                  Some people don't have the athleticism to move up in weight. Who is to say Corrales wouldn't have been dominant at Jr WW? He was clearly out of his element at 147.
                  That is an understatement Dom.

                  Comment

                  • jrosales13
                    undisputed champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 32632
                    • 738
                    • 763
                    • 40,023

                    #29
                    Originally posted by pacman777



                    barrera, morales and marquez >>> coralles
                    I think Corrales at 130 beats all of them... But, P4P those 3 were greater than Corrales.

                    Comment

                    • B.U.R.N.E.R
                      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 30186
                      • 1,344
                      • 400
                      • 47,475

                      #30
                      Jrosales your're wasting your time with Pacman777.

                      He started watching boxing in 2008 and had no idea who Floyd was as of May 2, 2009.

                      Originally posted by pacman777
                      just started watching boxing like a year ago, was not around during the mayweather time. was wondering why people call him a *****. i mean i watch some youtube clips of him and the hatton fight, guy seems legit

                      what's with the hate?
                      Last edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 05-11-2010, 04:23 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP