paul williams rise to the p4p #3 spot, ???????????? i dont see it
Collapse
-
-
dawson is better than williams and dawson isnt that overated as williams is, why does hbo instead not try to hype dawson up instead of paul, less ****** embarassing victories for an hbo fighter will come out of thisComment
-
Due for what? For losing to a 40 year old who had no legs regardless of what happened the second time? He takes so damn long to get back in the ring and that's why he shouldn't be in the top 3? He's good, don't get me wrong. But Dawson is where he's at because he doesn't fight often enough.Comment
-
You are entitled to your opinion. One reason why I try to give the guy the benefit of the doubt though is because he doesn't take long to get back in the ring and he stays pretty active. He's also fought four guys in a row ranked in the top five of their division. Say what you want about Phillips and Wright, but Winky was still in the top five at 160 I think. And Phillips had just beaten Spinks. The better names on his resume above 147 are Martinez and Cintron of course though.Comment
-
Aside from Mayweather and Pacquiao, almost all the top fighters right now are either old fighters who are past prime or young fighters who haven't really proven themselves. That is how a relatively mediocre fighter like Williams gets ranked in the top 5. You look at him fight and he does not seem like he deserves to be ranked that high, but who is out there that deserves to be ranked higher?Comment
-
But about the first part of my post. He's losing me as a fan because of his actions. And I think he may already be past his peak because he's been hit so much.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment