u get my point then.....
btw. mayweather-pacquiao, it all comes down to a RESPECT thing with you guys.
there is really NO ARGUMENT as to who looked better in their previous fights, cotto going into pacquiao, or mosley going into mayweather? most ppl would agree, mosley looked better before fighting mayweather. no argument there.
so that leads me to pacuqiao vs. floyd.
manny is viewed as dominant, great, non-stop, all action, etc.....so when he dominates an opponent, in your minds, it just underlines his greatness....
floyd is viewed as a ducker, runner, coward, etc.....so when he dominates an opponent, he still doesn't get the credit. you guys look at his opponents and make excuses as to WHY mayweather SHOULD HAVE WON. with manny, it's the opposite. you guys look at HIM after a victory, and praise his greatness.
not fair, and you dudes need to be more objective. that's why i appreciated merchant's and steward's comments following the fight, b/c they looked at mayweather, and gave credit to his skills. too many dudes on NSB, do the opposite. you guys acknowledge his skills, then downplay them at the next moment. **** has to stop.
look, there are already threads being made as to floyd being "bigger" than manny. so manny is so great, but the excuses are being put into place, so if mayweather DOES beat him, we'll look and say manny is smaller....
at some point, you have to look around, and say, "who can floyd fight and beat at this point, to receive credit?"
IMO, he'll have to move up and fight guys like abraham, dirrell, ward, dawson....
btw. mayweather-pacquiao, it all comes down to a RESPECT thing with you guys.
there is really NO ARGUMENT as to who looked better in their previous fights, cotto going into pacquiao, or mosley going into mayweather? most ppl would agree, mosley looked better before fighting mayweather. no argument there.
so that leads me to pacuqiao vs. floyd.
manny is viewed as dominant, great, non-stop, all action, etc.....so when he dominates an opponent, in your minds, it just underlines his greatness....
floyd is viewed as a ducker, runner, coward, etc.....so when he dominates an opponent, he still doesn't get the credit. you guys look at his opponents and make excuses as to WHY mayweather SHOULD HAVE WON. with manny, it's the opposite. you guys look at HIM after a victory, and praise his greatness.
not fair, and you dudes need to be more objective. that's why i appreciated merchant's and steward's comments following the fight, b/c they looked at mayweather, and gave credit to his skills. too many dudes on NSB, do the opposite. you guys acknowledge his skills, then downplay them at the next moment. **** has to stop.
look, there are already threads being made as to floyd being "bigger" than manny. so manny is so great, but the excuses are being put into place, so if mayweather DOES beat him, we'll look and say manny is smaller....
at some point, you have to look around, and say, "who can floyd fight and beat at this point, to receive credit?"
IMO, he'll have to move up and fight guys like abraham, dirrell, ward, dawson....
Comment