You know whats annoying about boxing. It seems like with every great fighter, theres a way to make them look bad. Its always he came a great time...scubby boobi had just left the division. And he made sure he ducked Piggi Wiggi. Its like c'mon man, can't anyone just be great? Theres always some story with every career or with every fight. The bottomline is, Floyd is undefeated and I don't see him losing to anybody except father time. He'll dominate manny in my opinion. Just being honest.
The truth about Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Collapse
-
I really like Manny as well. It's funny how you feel like you have to chose between the two around here. It seems so divided.
I've followed Floyd for longer so I like him a bit more than Pac and that makes me a nuthugging ***** and Pac hater in NSB. :jerk:Comment
-
I can't agree with that. You have to prove it in the ring.
If Tyson never fought Douglas/Holyfield or if Jones never fought Tarver or Tito never fought Hopkins. Every body would of said in retrospect Mike, Tito and Roy would of won that fight.
You have to win it in the ring you don't win it on paper. We don't know what would of happened in those fights. Floyd probably would of won but at the same time he could of lost. We just don't know and he put himself in that position of my doubting him going unbeaten in that stretch.Last edited by jrosales13; 05-07-2010, 09:21 AM.Comment
-
Exactly. I'm sure if more Pacquiao fans have followed Mayweather's career as long as most have they wouldn't take his trash talk serious and they would appreciate him more.Comment
-
While I still believe those would have been easy fights for Mayweather, I do agree with you here. This has always been my gripe with Mayweather.I can't agree with that. You have to prove it in the ring.
If Tyson never fought Douglas/Holyfield or if Jones never fought Tarver or Tito never fought Hopkins. Every body would of said in retrospect Mike, Tito and Tarver would of won that fight.
You have to win it in the ring you don't win it on paper. We don't know what would of happened in those fights. Floyd probably would of won but at the same time he could of lost. We just don't know and he put himself in that position of my doubting of him going unbeaten in that stretch.Comment
-
I remember reading an interview that Leonard Ellerbee gave in Ring magazine, he was instrumental in re-marketing Floyd to broader audiences which is why he appeared on Dancing with the Stars and took on the "Money" personae. That reminds me of another interview with Madonna in Playboy where she helped Deion Sanders invent "Showtime" personae and Dennis Rodman become well, Dennis Rodman.
Controversy sells and even Floyd said so himself in a recent Boxingscene interview - he makes good TV so all of his nonsense really just helps him make more money. I wonder if Shane who is a legend in his own right would have had bigger fights and more financial success if he did some of the same as opposed to being just the nice guy that he seems like.Comment
-
I can' take seriously the ones who think Floyd Mayweather acts real on 24/7....even the *****she doesn't want to be liked he wants to make money
but he is always very sporting after the fight even with guys that bad mouthed him like corrales
i think floyd felt that Arum should have made him a star. when it didn't seem like it was happening the way he wanted he took it upon himself to play the bad guy role and it helps him sell fights
i mean floyd got booed in his pro debut performance as I remember for show boating fans have never really liked him
floyd is a perfectionist in the ring and alot of people don't like perfection they want something tainted because they find it easier to relate to them than someone like floyd or roy jones who are SO gifted that it kind of breeds contempt
thats why people like boxers like Kelly Pavlik blue collar humble guy who has worked hard to get where he is at
some people forget that guys like floyd and roy have worked that hard aswell the fact that they seem to have GOD GIVEN TALENT puts them in a different catergory especially when criticism is flying around
i respect what floyd has done in the ring and the fact that he's doing the very best to provide for his family
all that greater than ali talk. it's just to sell a fight even though he probably really believes it lolComment
-
im a white american, and i agree with this 100%
my fellow white people would rather cheer for bumbling idiots like pavlik and mma fighters as opposed to the greatest fighter of this era (and possibly of all time) just because of the skin colors

Comment
-
I was about to say, I gave tons of props to Floyd...haha
Yes you are right but I think when you are at the level Floyd is at, it's hard to argue the contrary.I can't agree with that. You have to prove it in the ring.
If Tyson never fought Douglas/Holyfield or if Jones never fought Tarver or Tito never fought Hopkins. Every body would of said in retrospect Mike, Tito and Roy would of won that fight.
You have to win it in the ring you don't win it on paper. We don't know what would of happened in those fights. Floyd probably would of won but at the same time he could of lost. We just don't know and he put himself in that position of my doubting him going unbeaten in that stretch.Comment
Comment