I think it close but the fact that floyd walked down mosley and punished him even though thats not his primary style and that there was no catch-weight for this fight gives the edge to the mosley win by floyd.
Yeah man, it has flummoxed me. And I don't think once the glow of Floyd's win, which is still burning bright in our mind, dims that it'll make the choice any easier.
Floyd's was a stunning execution of technique, skill and smarts, while Pac's was a tour-de-force of explosiveness, dynamicism and relentlessness. (Both, of course, had some of all those factors)
i think a Mosley (2002) would equal to a cotto 145
dont forget cotto weighed in at 146 only couple weeks back clottey so weight was no issue.
02? Cmon.
Shane gave a PRIME cotto all he could handle 2 years ago.
A damaged Cotto at 145 would get badly beat by the 2008 Mosley not to mention in 2002.
Rewatch the the PBF-SM fight!!! I suggest in a big screen in HD. Shane was dominating round two big time but in the same round looked exhausted and could not finish the job. If that was not shot, what is? PBF would have been HATTONED by Pac in that round, no doubt.
close. because floyd put on a good neutralizing boxing performance. i slightly favour pac cotto though. it shocked me and boxing experts. not just *******s and *****s.
Comment