Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Roach Has a Drug Testing Solution

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
    I've always said I thought the 14 day period was good. For whatever reason Pac decided against it. In my opinion that isn't a big deal since he is agreeing to a bogus test (as far as being official) to begin with. Pac is the one who initially compromised by even entertaining the idea of the tests after a Mayweather ultimatum.
    No...Pacquiao is not the one who initially compromised. I know you want it desperately to be that way but that's not the case. He initially AGREED to the testing not initially compromised to the testing.

    So you believe the 14 day period was good. So which Pacquiao lie do you think was good?

    Comment


    • [QUOTE=JAB5239;8228096]
      Originally posted by Bhopreign View Post

      No you did not answer. You asked me if I ever said something to a different effect. So thats lie number 2 today. Got anymore?
      Its no wonder why you are dodging my questions. You would think I was asking you to submit to random testing or something.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
        No...Pacquiao is not the one who initially compromised. I know you want it desperately to be that way but that's not the case. He initially AGREED to the testing not initially compromised to the testing.

        So you believe the 14 day period was good. So which Pacquiao lie do you think was good?


        Agreeing to an unofficial test is a compromise in unto itself.

        Sorry Dizzy, you aren't going to bait me with the second part of your post. Good try though.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
          [/B]

          Agreeing to an unofficial test is a compromise in unto itself.

          Sorry Dizzy, you aren't going to bait me with the second part of your post. Good try though.
          No, it's not. Agreeing is not compromising. Compromising is compromising. Why are we creating our own definitions here? If both parties agree to something, there is no need for compromising. Both parties at the outset agreed to OST.

          Second, I'm not trying to bait you. I just found it convenient that you chose to ignore Pacquiao's lies regarding his reason for a cut-off date and decided to invent your own.

          Comment


          • [QUOTE=Bhopreign;8228117]
            Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

            Its no wonder why you are dodging my questions. You would think I was asking you to submit to random testing or something.

            I've proven you a liar not once, but twice tonight. Lol, you're a disgrace.

            Comment


            • [QUOTE=JAB5239;8228144]
              Originally posted by Bhopreign View Post

              I've proven you a liar not once, but twice tonight. Lol, you're a disgrace.
              You dodge the question because you realize the answer is hard to debate against, youre not as ignorant as once perceived I see.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                No, it's not. Agreeing is not compromising. Compromising is compromising. Why are we creating our own definitions here? If both parties agree to something, there is no need for compromising. Both parties at the outset agreed to OST.

                OST is unofficial. It was Floyd who wanted it. By accepting any kind of test outside of what is official is a compromise.

                Second, I'm not trying to bait you. I just found it convenient that you chose to ignore Pacquiao's lies regarding his reason for a cut-off date and decided to invent your own.

                Pac can back out of an unofficial test for any reason he wants, I really don't care. Now if its a rule and he backs out...than I have a problem with it.

                Comment


                • [QUOTE=Bhopreign;8228154]
                  Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

                  You dodge the question because you realize the answer is hard to debate against, youre not as ignorant as once perceived I see.
                  How many times was it again? Was it "numerous" times? Clown.

                  Do you really think you're being slick with your 6th grade schoolyard psychology?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                    OST is unofficial. It was Floyd who wanted it. By accepting any kind of test outside of what is official is a compromise.
                    No, it's not. Do you know what a compromise is? If I bought chocolate and asked if you wanted some and you said "yes"...did you compromise? Just because it's a new chocolate? You can't change the definition of a word to suit your argument.

                    Pac can back out of an unofficial test for any reason he wants, I really don't care. Now if its a rule and he backs out...than I have a problem with it.
                    So it's ok for him to lie and contradict himself with regards to testing. Got it.

                    Comment


                    • [QUOTE=JAB5239;8228190]
                      Originally posted by Bhopreign View Post

                      How many times was it again? Was it "numerous" times? Clown.

                      Do you really think you're being slick with your 6th grade schoolyard psychology?
                      Sad you cant answer if Floyd has a right to ask for testing, simple yes or no.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP