Are there any limitations to hair testing? Or is it still too limited of a test?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Roach Has a Drug Testing Solution
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by snd_dsigner_dan View PostAre there any limitations to hair testing? Or is it still too limited of a test?
It's an interesting question......but i think hair is the best for "illicit" drugs.....i'm not sure whether EPO or HGH use could be detected in chemical remenants left in the hair as readily as "recreational" drugs are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostNo, it's not. Agreeing is not compromising. Compromising is compromising. Why are we creating our own definitions here? If both parties agree to something, there is no need for compromising. Both parties at the outset agreed to OST.
Second, I'm not trying to bait you. I just found it convenient that you chose to ignore Pacquiao's lies regarding his reason for a cut-off date and decided to invent your own.
Comment
-
So they found a steroids closer to date? of course, its Philippines, thats what theyre good for. First, its obvious that they found a remedy for their pain, because if its NOTHING now and they are willing to get closer to the date now... why couldnt they do it before? what is the fckin difference? peanuts?? c mon roach.. this is a planned plan. May is smarter than that though, because if i found the flaw, of course the Mayweathers got it. Its like they r the high tech machine of the new era lololol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostNo, it's not. Do you know what a compromise is? If I bought chocolate and asked if you wanted some and you said "yes"...did you compromise? Just because it's a new chocolate?You can't change the definition of a word to suit your argument.
So it's ok for him to lie and contradict himself with regards to testing. Got it.Last edited by switchsouthpaw; 04-30-2010, 02:16 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostComing from the guy who stated that "is" and "believe" mean two entirely different things, then in the same comment said the word "is" ...is defined as "believe", it's no wonder that you take liberty with facts as you do with words, to support your narrative.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fcastro1 View Postunlike pac that **** is documented i think in the hatton 24 7 so we kno he has used it and we know that its only illegal in nevada like we know that nevada only uses standard urine tests. does it make it right like as u guys argue. because thats the practice of nevada does it make it right.
floyd is a cheat yet you morons keep going on about a guy who has never tested positive for anything. *****s really are hypocrites just like floyd.
2) I have NEVER said that Manny was cheating, unwad those panties. Fact.
3) Shane NEVER tested positive for anything either. Fact.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TortillaWarrior View PostIsn't this about boxing?
how many times do you have to read it to get it?
The entire reason for these tests demanded by Floyd,
was for the betterment of the sport?
What part are you not understanding?
Comment
-
Originally posted by TortillaWarrior View Post
I didn't think you had one. Now I remember why I rarely engage you,
you're not too bright.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Should I bump your thread?
Here is my point, since you have missed it the whole time....
My biggest thing with YOU is that since YOU claim that he has been on PED'S FOR 40 FIGHTS, why not give him credit for wanting to have his 41ST fight under more stringent testing?
Comment
Comment