look at his resume-there is your answer
So why isnt Wladimer top 10 P4P?
Collapse
-
i like how you guys, say "oh hes only good cause of his size"
if thats the ****in case, then valuev would be the best heavyweight boxer ever..
****in dumbass klit-haersComment
-
Comment
-
Pathetic attempt to degrade a quality champion.
Wlad is no doubt one of the top 10 fighters in the world. Let's try facts instead of blind hate.
*Holds the IBF, WBO and Ring Titles
*Since 2005 has beaten 8 top 10 fighters (Ring Magazine)
*9-0 in title fights since 2006 (8 kos)
*Defeated three current titlists (Byrd, Sultan, Chagaev)
*Defeated four undefeated fighters (Peter, Brock, Sultan, Chagaev)
*Possesses arguably the best jab and straight right hand in boxing with knock out power in either fist
hmmm...i'd say he qualifies
Comment
-
seems like those saying he shouldn't be on the list give no facts unlike the response i posted.
i would like someone to argue there are 10 other fighters who can match Wlad. Statistics, rankings, and facts are welcomed to support a counter argument
Last edited by nl543; 04-22-2010, 01:49 AM.Comment
-
good point. Also consider Chambers' last two fights. Dimitrenko is taller, longer and heavier than Wlad and was absolutely dominated by Eddie.
The smaller Wlad then went on win every minute of every round against Chambers, then put him to sleep. It's interesing to note that Chambers had never been hurt let alone knocked down as a pro.Comment
-
Facts don't show the true picture do they? The HW division is the weakest division in boxing and the Klitschko's have a big size advantage over most of the division. Wlad can only do what he does because of his size, his opponents find it difficult to get past his jab because of his size. If Wlad was 6'1, 215 lbs and had average reach, his style wouldn't be as affective.Comment
Comment