So why isnt Wladimer top 10 P4P?

[nl543]

Facts don't show the true picture do they? The HW division is the weakest division in boxing and the Klitschko's have a big size advantage over most of the division. Wlad can only do what he does because of his size, his opponents find it difficult to get past his jab because of his size. If Wlad was 6'1, 215 lbs and had average reach, his style wouldn't be as affective.

So why couldn't Dimitrenko (bigger than Wlad) do the same to Chambers then?

[$partacus]

So why couldn't Dimitrenko (bigger than Wlad) do the same to Chambers then?

FFS, Wlad is better than Dimitrenko, nobody is saying Wlad isn't a good boxer he's just not as good as those on the P4P list. Wlad wins fights because of his decent boxing skills and his size. Those on the P4P list fight fighters around their size, Klitschko fights smaller fighters. Not his fault, but if a fighter from a lower division was beating on guys 20 lbs lighter than them nobody would be impressed either.

[Pirao]

Facts don't show the true picture do they? The HW division is the weakest division in boxing and the Klitschko's have a big size advantage over most of the division. Wlad can only do what he does because of his size, his opponents find it difficult to get past his jab because of his size. If Wlad was 6'1, 215 lbs and had average reach, his style wouldn't be as affective.

Lololol, prove it.

[$partacus]

Lololol, prove it.

I don't need to prove **** everybody apart from Klitschko fans know it is.

[Pirao]

I can't prove **** because I'm a mindless drone that repeats what he hears.

Fyp

[CaRnAgEViOLaToR]

Wlad is far from top 10, IMO. Theres just too many great fighters 168-below.

[Ryannn]

the whole concept of p4p is if all guys where the same size, how would they be ranked.

wlad and vitali's biggest strenght is their size advantage over their opponents.

it isn't about accomplishment.

[JM1]

Dude is the ruler of his division for a real while now and he really hasnt had a serious challenge in a long time since losing in 2004. So that means he hasnt lost in 6 years.
Not only is he beating challenges but he's dominating and knocking them the **** out.

Just because the man is a heavyweight doesn't mean he shouldnt be in the top 10P4P.

i asked the same question before and i honestly dont know the answer as to why hes not there. he deserve to be in the top10 imo

[$partacus]

Fyp

You prove it isn't? You don't need proof to have an opinion. Now stick to the thread topic.

[Pirao]

Maybe we should make a list of the sources that have Wlad in the top 10 P4P, and those who don't, I'll start with the ones that have him in:

http://sports.yahoo.com/box/news;_ylt=AtcQvwl3gXzWc6kO3TEZqNeUxLYF?slug=ki-boxrankings042110

http://www.proboxing-fans.com/pound-for-pound/

http://www.********boxing.com/boxing-rankings.htm ---> (east side boxing)

http://www.pound4pound.com/P4PTop10.htm

http://www.theboxinghistorian.com/rankings.html

http://boxrec.com/ratings.php?countr...us=A&SUBMIT=Go

Feel free to add more, and I'm sure someone will do the ones in which Wlad is not included.