Pacquiao lacks defense, says Berto

[DeepSleep]

Hitting PacMan isn't really that big of a problem as many fighters have shown. The main problem is preventing your dome piece from getting wrecked that is as many fighters shown.

[| THE KING |]

berto is a good fighter, but, nowhere on pacmans level IMO. he's looking for a payday as much as everyone else and I dont blame him.

[B-Money]

he should fight bradley first or maybe clottey. before he even thinks about pac.

[ModernTalking]

PAC will make Berto complain about being hit in the back of the head.

[Silencers]

Berto himself lacks defense.

[Mr. Philadel]

nice one.....Berto is NOT so good at all IMO

[Kagami Taiga]

berto's right to some extent. but yea, if its a war between those two, i def pick berto to go down first. sure hes just as fst as pac, but his workrate is **** compared to pacs.

[check hook]

berto's right to some extent. but yea, if its a war between those two, i def pick berto to go down first. sure hes just as fst as pac, but his workrate is **** compared to pacs.

he cuts too much weight imo.......needs to focus on staying closer to WW limit in btw fights.......that way he would have more energy.

[FeFist]

Berto was correct on his assessment of Pacquiao but I don't think he has the tools necessary to beat Pacquiao.

That being said, he's in a situation where he wants to shock the world so I'm not going to knock him.

[whirlwind]

Berto makes good points.

Cotto, Clottey were both able to hit Pacquiao at will.

And there's nothing cool about taking punishment

Are you serious or you must be joking right?
How many rounds did Cotto and Clottey wins against Pac when you said they hit him at will? Or how about Oscar and Hatton?