WADA: The only experts on PED's say about HGH........

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flexxx145
    Banned
    • Dec 2009
    • 2085
    • 87
    • 106
    • 2,291

    #31
    Originally posted by GroundSt.Pound
    Oh yeah. I fully expect WADA, who sees any kind of drug as the ultimate evil, to tell the truth about them and report on them objectively.

    USADA is not a credible source because it reports from one side of the spectrum.
    Yet the heads of governments around the world, the UN, and the Olympic committee think that WADA does a great job. They couldn't do their job if they were biased.

    Comment

    • TheNegation
      No Picks
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 2588
      • 114
      • 67
      • 9,609

      #32
      Originally posted by flexxx145
      My original post is taken from the WADA website. It is they not me that say that random urine and blood testing is needed to ensure fair competition. Don't believe me if you want to but these are the experts. WADA sets the standards for anti-doping world wide. So you can defend Manny all you want there is no excuse. Your conjecture and personal opinions while entertaining, are fact-less and lacking in truth.
      At least I do my own research and post my own thoughts, opinions and knowledge. You just post a link and pretend to be intelligent, when the sad thing is, you don't even understand what you are posting

      Comment

      • PureBoxer
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 692
        • 131
        • 30
        • 816

        #33
        Blood testing is superior to urine testing. It's a step in the right direction.

        Comment

        • TheNegation
          No Picks
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 2588
          • 114
          • 67
          • 9,609

          #34
          Originally posted by flexxx145
          Yet the heads of governments around the world, the UN, and the Olympic committee think that WADA does a great job. They couldn't do their job if they were biased.
          You do realize that the US Government brought in "experts" from the FDA and DEA during the steroid hearings in the 80's and all their "experts" said that steroids and PED's in general posed no legitimate health concerns, yet the Goverment completely ignored their "experts" and banned them anyway.

          Now tell me that isn't biased.

          Half of the fat **** idiots running this country, don't even know what a steroid is.

          Comment

          • PureBoxer
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 692
            • 131
            • 30
            • 816

            #35
            Originally posted by GroundSt.Pound
            You do realize that the US Government brought in "experts" from the FDA and DEA during the steroid hearings in the 80's and all their "experts" said that steroids and PED's in general posed no legitimate health concerns, yet the Goverment completely ignored their "experts" and banned them anyway.

            Now tell me that isn't biased.

            Half of the fat **** idiots running this country, don't even know what a steroid is.
            Have you used "steroids" before?

            Serious question.

            Comment

            • flexxx145
              Banned
              • Dec 2009
              • 2085
              • 87
              • 106
              • 2,291

              #36
              Originally posted by GroundSt.Pound
              At least I do my own research and post my own thoughts, opinions and knowledge. You just post a link and pretend to be intelligent, when the sad thing is, you don't even understand what you are posting
              I don't have to pretend anything, lol! You don't know diddly about me. So lets get that straight. The thing about opinions is that everybody has one and they all stink. You have no knowledge, you have done no scientific research, no studies, so where did you get this knowledge? From a source, or written word just like I did. The difference is my source has authority. While yours does not. If you ever attended higher education you would know the difference between the two.

              Comment

              • TheNegation
                No Picks
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 2588
                • 114
                • 67
                • 9,609

                #37
                Originally posted by PureBoxer
                Have you used "steroids" before?

                Serious question.
                Nope. Someday maybe. I have reason to use them now.

                Comment

                • TheNegation
                  No Picks
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 2588
                  • 114
                  • 67
                  • 9,609

                  #38
                  Originally posted by flexxx145
                  I don't have to pretend anything, lol! You don't know diddly about me. So lets get that straight. The thing about opinions is that everybody has one and they all stink. You have no knowledge, you have done no scientific research, no studies, so where did you get this knowledge? From a source, or written word just like I did. The difference is my source has authority. While yours does not. If you ever attended higher education you would know the difference between the two.
                  What I'm posting is common knowledge. What you are posting is the biased opinions and findings of Doping Police. How do you expect people who are gung ho anti-doping to be honest about their findings and research?

                  Comment

                  • flexxx145
                    Banned
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 2085
                    • 87
                    • 106
                    • 2,291

                    #39
                    It's always fun to dust a pac fan off.

                    Comment

                    • flexxx145
                      Banned
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 2085
                      • 87
                      • 106
                      • 2,291

                      #40
                      Originally posted by GroundSt.Pound
                      What I'm posting is common knowledge. What you are posting is the biased opinions and findings of Doping Police. How do you expect people who are gung ho anti-doping to be honest about their findings and research?
                      In your humble opinion they are biased. But in the opinion of everybody not a fan or affiliated with pac they are fair.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP