WADA: The only experts on PED's say about HGH........
Collapse
-
At least I do my own research and post my own thoughts, opinions and knowledge. You just post a link and pretend to be intelligent, when the sad thing is, you don't even understand what you are postingMy original post is taken from the WADA website. It is they not me that say that random urine and blood testing is needed to ensure fair competition. Don't believe me if you want to but these are the experts. WADA sets the standards for anti-doping world wide. So you can defend Manny all you want there is no excuse. Your conjecture and personal opinions while entertaining, are fact-less and lacking in truth.Comment
-
You do realize that the US Government brought in "experts" from the FDA and DEA during the steroid hearings in the 80's and all their "experts" said that steroids and PED's in general posed no legitimate health concerns, yet the Goverment completely ignored their "experts" and banned them anyway.
Now tell me that isn't biased.
Half of the fat **** idiots running this country, don't even know what a steroid is.Comment
-
Have you used "steroids" before?You do realize that the US Government brought in "experts" from the FDA and DEA during the steroid hearings in the 80's and all their "experts" said that steroids and PED's in general posed no legitimate health concerns, yet the Goverment completely ignored their "experts" and banned them anyway.
Now tell me that isn't biased.
Half of the fat **** idiots running this country, don't even know what a steroid is.
Serious question.Comment
-
I don't have to pretend anything, lol! You don't know diddly about me. So lets get that straight. The thing about opinions is that everybody has one and they all stink. You have no knowledge, you have done no scientific research, no studies, so where did you get this knowledge? From a source, or written word just like I did. The difference is my source has authority. While yours does not. If you ever attended higher education you would know the difference between the two.Comment
-
Comment
-
What I'm posting is common knowledge. What you are posting is the biased opinions and findings of Doping Police. How do you expect people who are gung ho anti-doping to be honest about their findings and research?I don't have to pretend anything, lol! You don't know diddly about me. So lets get that straight. The thing about opinions is that everybody has one and they all stink. You have no knowledge, you have done no scientific research, no studies, so where did you get this knowledge? From a source, or written word just like I did. The difference is my source has authority. While yours does not. If you ever attended higher education you would know the difference between the two.Comment
-
In your humble opinion they are biased. But in the opinion of everybody not a fan or affiliated with pac they are fair.Comment
Comment