So the opinions of boxing analyst don't matter when it fits your agenda, but when their opinions do, you suddenly agree with them? Hypocrisy at it's finest. A few moments ago, it was "well analyst say this and that, haha".
He did duck Raheem and Guzman. In fact, I believe Guzman wrote an open letter to Pac asking for a fight and Pac refused to step in the ring with him. We all know the story of Raheem. Morales beats down Pac, Raheem beats down Morales. Who's Pac fight? The man coming off an L, and not the man that dominated the man with the L ,11 out of 12 rounds.
Pac also ducked Mosely, who according to Roach, "was too good a fighter for Pac". And Pac ducked Mayweather.
Why would he be mad?
It wont end because you're talking out your ass. You don't know what you're talking about.
He did duck Raheem and Guzman. In fact, I believe Guzman wrote an open letter to Pac asking for a fight and Pac refused to step in the ring with him. We all know the story of Raheem. Morales beats down Pac, Raheem beats down Morales. Who's Pac fight? The man coming off an L, and not the man that dominated the man with the L ,11 out of 12 rounds.
Pac also ducked Mosely, who according to Roach, "was too good a fighter for Pac". And Pac ducked Mayweather.
Why would he be mad?
It wont end because you're talking out your ass. You don't know what you're talking about.
Comment