Another Fighter Asks 4 Stricter Drug Testing
Collapse
-
So what does this mean? That he doesn't know what he's talking about when he speaks on PEDs?“Adding Conte as your steroid/PED consultant is like employing Jack The Ripper to teach your wife or daughter how to avoid sexual assault.” … Michael Marley.Comment
-
whats this? somehow u r absolutely convinced some guy is on peds.
yet u dont know which kind he's using. some expert u r.Comment
-
furthermore you guys act like you know what he's taking since you thin he can just mask it so easily
lean muscle mass is something else. But you guys are su****ious of what could be just 5lbs of lean muscle mass.
The fact is you dont know how much lean muscle mass he's gained, you dont measure his body fat percentage, or have any record of them. are you telling us he gained 12 lbs of muscle mass in a matter of a few months?Comment
-
He knows how to use them, but he's hardly a trustworthy source of opinion. His background makes him the most biased and cynical imaginable witness. And he only knows about how to cheat, he is far from being an expert on legal modern nutritional science or training methods - which the statement you quoted would require him to be for it to be worth ****.Last edited by Dave Rado; 04-07-2010, 04:34 PM.Comment
-
I'm saying I don't care. You're taking the conversation elsewhere and I'm not biting. My INITIAL statement was in regards to those who say "Well he weighed 148 on fight night when he was a lightweight" like that somehow means something. It means nothing.furthermore you guys act like you know what he's taking since you thin he can just mask it so easily
lean muscle mass is something else. But you guys are su****ious of what could be just 5lbs of lean muscle mass.
The fact is you dont know how much lean muscle mass he's gained, you dont measure his body fat percentage, or have any record of them. are you telling us he gained 12 lbs of muscle mass in a matter of a few months?Comment
-
Why do you say his background makes him biased? You do realize his background in nutritional science is extensive? In fact, brilliant?He knows how to use them, but he's hardly a trustworthy source of opinion. His background makes him the most biased and cynical imaginable witness. And he only knows about how to cheat, he is far from being an expert on legal modern nutritional science or training methods - which the statement you quoted would require him to be for it to be worth ****.Comment
Comment