David Haye and Jeff Lacy prove that lifting weights is bad for a boxer
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Two different extremes? Barely built any muscle? He came in at 174 lbs (next heaviest to date). Haye is a heavyweight, 231 lbs (316 lba when he fought Valuev), of course he's going to look bulky.
Don't get so sore and tacky cause everyone is pissing on your little parade. You thought you were being smart and controversial - we think you're being a silly ****.
Best regards.Last edited by Main Source; 04-04-2010, 01:55 PM.Comment
-
Since when does lifting weights make your arms heavy?
When you gain muscle your body has the STRENGTH to support "heavy" arms. ******. Which means they arent heavy at all.
Do any of yall even work out?Comment
-
hell nah dawg
u know damn well most of these dudes are overweight couch potatos
they dont know squat about trainingComment
-
Being overly muscled can be bad. However I don't think Haye or Lacy have that terrible stamina, although Lacy is a bit ponderous.
I could be wrong but didn't Lacy claim he never lifted weights? I don't believe it myself though, just looking at him.
Many boxers lift weights, but it shouldn't be the major part of your training. See Shannon Briggs...Comment
-
you will definitely feel heavier when you gain weight, you may be stronger, but when you get tired, you'll really get tiredComment
-
I dont think it effects all boxers the same. Take Khan for example, pre-prescott the guy was top heavy. VERY top heavy. It effected his game a lot. The kid had no muscle in his lower body, to which a boxer should have. How UK trainers did not see this is beyond me. Afterwards ofcourse his game has improved a lot and he is now evenly balanced i should say. Now, Take Juan Urango for example. Being built like a tank i think worked perfectly for him. He was never a slickster and relied only on his strength. Which got him Two World Titles. It can vary.Comment
Comment