Comments Thread For: Povetkin's Trainer: Klitschko's Opponents Do Nothing

[boxingking500]

You're probably among the other morons who were predicting your God would ko Chambers no later than round 6, just as you're doing now. But in the end, the very undersized Eddie almost went the distance.

the fact is the matter is your Chambers got KTFO, i dont care if it was in round 1 or round 12, he got knocked out...

Wlad won, get over it, he'll keep on beating guys....... so whos the next fighter your going to hype up, and then when he loses, call him a bum

[The Hammer]

Where exactly is he criticizing him? From what I read he does nothing but praise him and criticizes the opponents.

Atlas has been EXTREMELY negative about the Klitschkos over the years, more than anyone else, beginning with Wlad's fight on ESPN in 1998 against Phil Jackson.

He picked Byrd, Brock, Austin, Brewster, Ibragimov, Thompson and Rahman to defeat Wlad. I remember Tessitore's "nooooo" reaction when he picked Thompson...

Atlas made that infamous comment about Wlad having "no chin, no balls, and no heart"...

Not wanting to seem to be a total idiot, he's beginning to begrudgingly give a little respect to Wlad. However, saying one's opponents were no good is usually a method of discrediting the fighter...

If those opponents were so bad, why did Atlas pick most of them to defeat Wlad?

[boxingking500]

Atlas has been EXTREMELY negative about the Klitschkos over the years, more than anyone else, beginning with Wlad's fight on ESPN in 1998 against Phil Jackson.

He picked Byrd, Brock, Austin, Brewster, Ibragimov, Thompson and Rahman to defeat Wlad. I remember Tessitore's "nooooo" reaction when he picked Thompson...

Atlas made that infamous comment about Wlad having "no chin, no balls, and no heart"...

Not wanting to seem to be a total idiot, he's beginning to begrudgingly give a little respect to Wlad. However, saying one's opponents were no good is usually a method of discrediting the fighter...

If those opponents were so bad, why did Atlas pick most of them to defeat Wlad?

oh pwned... good job carnivore



tourlou is going to hate this...........hahahahahah

[hermes]

Ever since the Peter fight WK has managed to nullify his opponents game plan and impose his own. Granted K's style is boring, but it is effective. Since he does exactly the same thing every fight, and no one's been able to find a solution I don't think Teddy will either.

[Tiozzo]

the fact is the matter is your Chambers got KTFO, i dont care if it was in round 1 or round 12, he got knocked out...

Wlad won, get over it, he'll keep on beating guys....... so whos the next fighter your going to hype up, and then when he loses, call him a bum

Put this in you head : I never hype up fighters. I never call a fighter a bum just to not give credit to his conqueror.

I never call a fighter a bum if I thought he was good before a fight.

Example : Arreola was already a bum to me before he fought Vitali. After the fight, he was still the same bum. Arreola was a hype job whom I have always seen for what he was : a fat ass, lazy bum.

Chambers, I thought he was a very good fighter before he fought Wlad. I still think the same thing. There's no shame in being beat by the best HW on the planet.

So you fail.

[Tiozzo]

Atlas has been EXTREMELY negative about the Klitschkos over the years, more than anyone else, beginning with Wlad's fight on ESPN in 1998 against Phil Jackson.

He picked Byrd, Brock, Austin, Brewster, Ibragimov, Thompson and Rahman to defeat Wlad. I remember Tessitore's "nooooo" reaction when he picked Thompson...

Atlas made that infamous comment about Wlad having "no chin, no balls, and no heart"...

Not wanting to seem to be a total idiot, he's beginning to begrudgingly give a little respect to Wlad. However, saying one's opponents were no good is usually a method of discrediting the fighter...

If those opponents were so bad, why did Atlas pick most of them to defeat Wlad?

Atlas likes to pick the underdogs, and his predictions are most of the time inaccurate.

The fact is this : we're talking about the article we all just read, and in this article, whatever Atlas may have been saying in the past, he's not criticizing Wlad, he's praising him, he's criticizing the way his opponents fight him.

You Klitards, as I said, see hating everywhere when it comes down to subjects about the Klits. You're so pathetic.

[Tiozzo]

Ever since the Peter fight WK has managed to nullify his opponents game plan and impose his own. Granted K's style is boring, but it is effective. Since he does exactly the same thing every fight, and no one's been able to find a solution I don't think Teddy will either.

That's what I've been saying forever : he's boring, but effective. Effectiveness alone doesn'T WIN the hearts of the fans.

[The Hammer]

Atlas likes to pick the underdogs, and his predictions are most of the time inaccurate.

The fact is this : we're talking about the article we all just read, and in this article, whatever Atlas may have been saying in the past, he's not criticizing Wlad, he's praising him, he's criticizing the way his opponents fight him.

You Klitards, as I said, see hating everywhere when it comes down to subjects about the Klits. You're so pathetic.

All you ever do is bash and discredit Wlad - it virtually defines you.

You're the pathetic one for sure!

[Tiozzo]

All you ever do is bash and discredit Wlad - it virtually defines you.

You're the pathetic one for sure!

Carnivore, you're famous here for being the less objective poster and greatest **** rider the Klits have ever had.

I, on the other hand, am the nuthugger nor the hater of no one. Wlad deserves all the credit in the world for dominating good contenders and other champions like he does, that's what I've always been saying, but the thing is he will always be branded a boring fighter if he keeps on fighting like he does, and he deserves to be criticized to be fighting like he does, which is safety first, jab, holding, leaning, using his height and reach. Wlad doesn't care about the show, only about the win.

But I can't blame him : he's that cautious since getting KTFO by Brewster. He said enough already with me getting KTFO, I'll fight these guys safety first, **** the entertainment side of it.

[boxingking500]

Carnivore, you're famous here for being the less objective poster and greatest **** rider the Klits have ever had.

I, on the other hand, am the nuthugger nor the hater of no one. Wlad deserves all the credit in the world for dominating good contenders and other champions like he does, that's what I've always been saying, but the thing is he will always be branded a boring fighter if he keeps on fighting like he does, and he deserves to be criticized to be fighting like he does, which is safety first, jab, holding, leaning, using his height and reach. Wlad doesn't care about the show, only about the win.

But I can't blame him : he's that cautious since getting KTFO by Brewster. He said enough already with me getting KTFO, I'll fight these guys safety first, **** the entertainment side of it.

maybe it is boring because wlad dominates his opposition..

50,000 people came to see wlad and chambers..... and rooted for wlad ( i guess they dont find it boring) just cause americans find them boring, it doesn't mean they are.

wlad doesn't need to change his style, it suits him, its effective, i dont think he is boring....