Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: Mayweather Needs Me, I Don't Need Him

[tru2boxingfan]

This just shows how low your boxing knowledge is. Please stop posting here in boxingscene. It's already full of *****s and *******s. *****s don't even reach your level of hating Pac.

Who said i hated Pac dumbazz? The man has won me money any who does that is good in my book. I'm just simply stating facts about all tyme greats. P4P list was irrevelant until when? Until Roy Jones Jr. first said im the great p4p fighter ever. Once he made that comment, every boxing analyst and critic started making p4p list and so on and so on. The only list that matter before P4P is still matters is the G.O.A.T period.

[Dave Rado]

Manny has to lose or retire to lose his spot at the throne.

You have no idea how the P4P lists work. It's not a title you can win or lose. It's just a concensus view among boxing experts about who are the best fighters, making allowances for their weight differences.

If Pac continues to fight inferior opposition to Floyd, he'll certainly lose his #1 spot sooner or later. Similarly, even before Floyd's "retirement" two years ago, The Ring was saying that Floyd was close to losing the #1 spot to Pac because of their relative quality of opposition at that time.

[El Matatan]

If Mayweather wins and agrees to fight Pacquiao, will Pac agree to take the test? I hope he does, just so we can see the fight.

[check hook]

You have no idea how the P4P lists work. It's not a title you can win or lose. It's just a concensus view among boxing experts about who are the best fighters, making allowances for their weight.

It's also bias (favourably) to fightrs in lower classes and fighters who move btw weights........

[tru2boxingfan]

records dont mean nothing look at jcc jr and hes fought nothing but bums

LMFAO you are absolutely right on that one

[Dave Rado]

It's also bias (favourably) to fightrs in lower classes and fighters who move btw weights........

Often, but not always. Tyson was The Ring's P4P #1 at one time. Hopkins was P4P #1 at a time when he had only ever fought at Middleweight. And there are plenty more examples.

[BadBrains]

Who said i hated Pac dumbazz? The man has won me money any who does that is good in my book. I'm just simply stating facts about all tyme greats. P4P list was irrevelant until when? Until Roy Jones Jr. first said im the great p4p fighter ever. Once he made that comment, every boxing analyst and critic started making p4p list and so on and so on. The only list that matter before P4P is still matters is the G.O.A.T period.

A true dumba** for life. Don't even say you don't hate pac when all you did was hate him on this thread. P4P list was not made before roy jones? That is an absolute insult to Sugar Ray Robinson. As I've said, you have very little knowledge of boxing.

[Sugar Q]

This just shows how low your boxing knowledge is. Please stop posting here in boxingscene. It's already full of *****s and *******s. *****s don't even reach your level of hating Pac.

I agree with him. Floyd is #1 until someone beats him and he solidified that with the Marquez win just like if Calzaghe returns he would be top dawg from 168-175. The only ones who should be ranked above him is Dawson or Ward (if they keep winning) other than that Calzaghe would be the man.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

This is a joke. Boxing needs this fight Pacquiao you idiot.

[tru2boxingfan]

You have no idea how the P4P lists work. It's not a title you can win or lose. It's just a concensus view among boxing experts about who are the best fighters, making allowances for their weight differences.

If Pac continues to fight inferior opposition to Floyd, he'll certainly lose his #1 spot sooner or later. Similarly, even before Floyd's "retirement" two years ago, The Ring was saying that Floyd was close to losing the #1 spot to Pac because of their relative quality of opposition at that time.

Exactly and amongst the two list. P4P List and ATG list which one is of greater importance? People can make a top 5 p4p list and never see the top 50 ATG list.