Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: Mayweather Needs Me, I Don't Need Him

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eMPi
    Banned
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 13
    • 0
    • 0
    • 31

    #181
    Fool...

    Originally posted by Sugar Q
    If Pac really wants the fight he would agree to random testing and take the position of the challenger with a 65/35-70/30 split especially if PBF/Mosley does 2 million + PPVs.
    Now your showing your true color...
    You sond like your one of mayflower boytoy...
    LOL

    Comment

    • The Hate Giver
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 1217
      • 109
      • 41
      • 1,373

      #182
      Originally posted by Dave Rado
      Yeah, right. That's why Calzaghe got the #3 spot, despite never having beaten any future Hall of Famers in or near their primes, and despite only winning titles in two weight classes, one of them an in between one. Ridiculous post. Your screen name is well chosen.
      did he get 1#?

      So you dont think a american owned magazine wouldnt be favorable to american fighters? Only gullible & politically correct sheep would think otherwise. Just like your signature showing links of calzaghe trying to make fights with jones or hopkins written by uk based sites.

      sure sheep.

      Comment

      • BadBrains
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 779
        • 22
        • 3
        • 6,879

        #183
        Originally posted by tru2boxingfan
        You are just simple minded idiot. I never said I dislike Pacquiao, I stated my disagreements with his hype. I feel the same way about De La Hoya. Everyone ranks him high amongst the ATG and I highly disagree. He beat an old Chavez, and from that point on every super fight he has fought with an A-level fighter he has lost too. Hopkins, Trinidad, Mosley, Mayweather, and yes even Pacquiao. Did I say the p4p list wasn't made before Jones? Nope. I said it was Irrevelant until he claim to be the greatest p4p fighter of all tyme. That when everyone started making a list. Wbo p4p list, WBC p4p list and etc...
        You are comparing DLH and Pacquiao's career. Amazing. P4P list has become relevant the moment the heavyweight division died fool.

        Comment

        • BadBrains
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 779
          • 22
          • 3
          • 6,879

          #184
          Originally posted by The Hate Giver
          did he get 1#?

          So you dont think a american owned magazine wouldnt be favorable to american fighters? Only gullible & politically correct sheep would think otherwise. Just like your signature showing links of calzaghe trying to make fights with jones or hopkins written by uk based sites.

          sure sheep.
          If american magazine are favorable to american fighters, how the hell is pac the fighter of the decade, and p4p #1 atm? British magazines or articles are the most biased ones.

          Comment

          • pasawayako
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 15348
            • 639
            • 194
            • 151,963

            #185
            Originally posted by Sugar Q
            Who voted him in Jim Lampley. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your delusional if you think a man with 3 losses and a draw is fighter of the decade over a man that's 40-0 with wins over the same guys closer to or in their primes.
            Where are you came from? Haven't you know that the BWAA pick pacquiao as the fighter of the decade and the votes wasn't even close. Sorry buddy even his fellow american can't pick floyd for the award because he done nothing to be even a threat to pac in the FIGHTER OF THE DECADE award.

            Comment

            • checko12
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 256
              • 18
              • 11
              • 6,457

              #186
              Originally posted by Sugar Q
              That was cute but once again it's about the when not just the win. Like you failed to point out who the unbeaten fighters were. Floyd stopped 2 undefeated champions (CORRALES AND HATTON) viciously now tell me who the unbeaten jokers Manny beat were? Manny has been cleverly marketed with big names but when he fought them is the thing. When is the last time Manny fought someone with great winning momentum? Floyd has always fought fighters with great winning momentum especially in big fights.
              I'd hardly call those wins "vicious".

              Comment

              • tru2boxingfan
                Contender
                • Feb 2010
                • 114
                • 5
                • 0
                • 6,156

                #187
                Originally posted by Natedatpkid
                OMG SHUT THE **** UP!!!!!!! You both need each other, both of you will look like freakin ******s when this fight doesn't get made. Our grandchildren are gonna freakin kick themselves when they see how ******ed we were in our generation for not making the fight of our generation happen.

                Both of you shut the hell up and just fight each other you fn morons.
                Its a mega-fight, but in order for it to happen. Pacquiao will have to get rid of that disgrace of boxing that he has smuthering him Arum. If he can buy himself out, that fight happens. With better negotiations. You take Arum off the table Floyd will probably even say okay 60/40 winner gets 60 and random drug testing, but as long as Arum is there, he wont remotely get anything of the sort.

                Comment

                • Jamel H
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 1130
                  • 51
                  • 0
                  • 10,843

                  #188
                  Originally posted by natedatpkid
                  omg shut the **** up!!!!!!! You both need each other, both of you will look like freakin ******s when this fight doesn't get made. Our grandchildren are gonna freakin kick themselves when they see how ******ed we were in our generation for not making the fight of our generation happen.

                  Both of you shut the hell up and just fight each other you fn morons.
                  **** boxing needs em

                  Comment

                  • The Hate Giver
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 1217
                    • 109
                    • 41
                    • 1,373

                    #189
                    Originally posted by BadBrains
                    If american magazine are favorable to american fighters, how the hell is pac the fighter of the decade, and p4p #1 atm? British magazines or articles are the most biased ones.
                    because he truly deserves it. that doesnt mean they are free from favoritism towards american fighters.

                    humans are tribal & very patriotic.

                    Comment

                    • Dave Rado
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 8064
                      • 266
                      • 453
                      • 14,460

                      #190
                      Originally posted by The Hate Giver
                      did he get 1#?

                      So you dont think a american owned magazine wouldnt be favorable to american fighters? Only gullible & politically correct sheep would think otherwise. Just like your signature showing links of calzaghe trying to make fights with jones or hopkins written by uk based sites.

                      sure sheep.
                      #3 is arguably higher than Calzaghe deserved. #1 would have been ridiculous. If there was any American bias he wouldn't have even got in the top 10.
                      Last edited by Dave Rado; 03-22-2010, 12:22 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP