Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: The Top 25 Heavyweights of All-Time – Top Ten

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Lacrimosa View Post
    Yeh, destruction itself

    Yeh, I find it not a very good sign, because basically what is everybody saying here is that "If Dempsey and Arreola were to fight, Dempsey would have knocked Chris out cold, cause he is inducted in the Hall of Fame" How can a (lets take Jack`s maximum weight) 200lbs fighter knock out cold a 250lbs fighter with a granite chin? Or maybe Dempsey hit harder than Arreola? Nonsense! Or maybe he was Pacquaioshly fast? No,he wasn`t! I didn`t see incredible defense either... Dempsey could move and bob well, but when he started to trade...

    Another question: would Dempsey beat Tua?
    OMG... Dempsey would have beaten Arreola because Arreola sucks and because Jack Dempsey is Jack Dempsey. Arreola is fat at 250, Dempsey was lean and muscular at his own weight.

    You can't judge the power of a man based on his size or weight. The biggest punchers in history were all below 220 at their best : Shavers (around 210), Marciano (around 185), Tyson (around 218), Dempsey, Louis (around 212), Foreman (around 218). And no, Arreola doesn't have a granite chin. He was dropped hard in the past by Walker. I don't think Dempsey would beat Tua, but there is no doubt Tua knocks Arreola out cold. Tua is actually a good fighter, he has proven himself. Arreola failed.

    You should stop right there, you're just embarrassing yourself...

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
      I was thinking about Holyfield. I think all those losses should count more against him.
      If Holyfield's losses (something like 7 of which came after the age of 38 or 39 when he was well past his best) should Ray Robinson's 19 losses (again, most of which came when he was done as a fighter) count against him?

      Comment


      • #63
        Great list Cliff, I love when you do this type of lists...

        Personally I would have Lennox Lewis at #6 and move everybody ahead of him down a spot. But, that is my opinion.

        Top 5 to me is perfect... Thanks for the list Cliff.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
          By Cliff Rold - For any new boxing fan, the time is not long before a fellow fan points out a magic number which grows more mythologized with time: eight. As in boxing’s original eight weight classes. The number represents in the mind of many a time when the sport was compressed into fields which couldn’t help but be talented, couldn’t help but draw crowds, because there were so few places on the scale to go. They were divisions marked by single champions ever challenged by a depth of contenders today’s seventeen weight classes rarely know. [Click Here To Read More]
          Muhammed Ali !!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by One more round View Post
            If Holyfield's losses (something like 7 of which came after the age of 38 or 39 when he was well past his best) should Ray Robinson's 19 losses (again, most of which came when he was done as a fighter) count against him?
            If I may...

            Holy has had 54 total fights. He lost almost 19% of his fights.

            RR has had 198 fights. He lost almost 10% of his fights.

            You see, even though RR and Holyfield both fought the best of their era and both fought for way too long, we can see Holyfield has a lot more losses.

            Anyway, losses always count against you, but less if you're over the hill...

            Comment


            • #66
              good list.id have lewis above holyfield

              Comment


              • #67
                Great list. It's especially gratifying because the Klitschkos are nowhere to be seen.

                As it should be.

                Nice to see some historical perspective put them in their rightful place...nothing frustrates me more than seeing young whippersnappers running around these foroms worshipping the Klits because they are heavyweights, while at the same time they dismiss someome like Pacquiao because he is a "pipsqueak."

                Comment


                • #68
                  wlad should be on that list

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Al Pacino View Post
                    wlad should be on that list
                    Being active exclude you from the list. The only active fighter on the list is Holyfield. And, that really is cuz no matter what he accomplish from here on out will not change his rating.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                      Being active exclude you from the list. The only active fighter on the list is Holyfield. And, that really is cuz no matter what he accomplish from here on out will not change his rating.
                      oh...ok............

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP