Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Anti-Doping Agency: "A positive test for Shane or Floyd means a 2 year BAN!"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
    Yeah at the end of the day we didnt get every single detail. It could play out where the fight goes on and you have to forfeit a percentage of your purse to the opponent. Maybe you have to pay upfront money. Maybe the title get stripped in Shanes case. Lots of different things can happen.
    I think that is the most like scenerio if the winner is the one who gets popped might will not get credit and end in a no contest.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
      boxing is unique from all other sports and the punishment/non-punishments it administers...we cant take a precedent from cycling and think boxing will follow suit and use it as a template




      so basically, we dont know...
      If a positive test is produced, WADA code penalties are in place


      http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/Wo...DE_2009_EN.pdf

      Page 55

      First violation: At a minimum, a reprimand and no
      period of Ineligibility from future Events, and at a
      maximum, two (2) years of Ineligibility.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
        so lets say one pops and the fight goes on, then the whole thing is a joke
        No, yes, maybe, I don't know.... I am just going to wait for more details and see how this whole things play out. Before I give my opinion in the matter.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
          so lets say one pops and the fight goes on, then the whole thing is a joke
          Why would it be a joke? The fight could only go on with the other fighter's consent which even then is doubtful. They are implementing the same rules applied in the Olympics - you can't just keep fighting like it's all good (you must have them confused the NSAC). A positive test is not a joke, man.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
            Why would it be a joke? The fight could only go on with the other fighter's consent which even then is doubtful. They are implementing the same rules applied in the Olympics - you can't just keep fighting like it's all good (you must have them confused the NSAC). A positive test is not a joke, man.
            That's what I'm saying, they strip medals. They aren't going to continue to let you fight for ****s and giggles. This is serious stuff here.

            Comment


            • #36
              The fight will probably still take place because they can make millions from this fight. Too much money to lose if they cancel the fight for a drug test. They can announce the positive drug test after fight and suspend the fighter.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                Why would it be a joke? The fight could only go on with the other fighter's consent which even then is doubtful. They are implementing the same rules applied in the Olympics - you can't just keep fighting like it's all good (you must have them confused the NSAC). A positive test is not a joke, man.
                Thank you man.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  Why would it be a joke? The fight could only go on with the other fighter's consent which even then is doubtful. They are implementing the same rules applied in the Olympics - you can't just keep fighting like it's all good (you must have them confused the NSAC). A positive test is not a joke, man.



                  the premise of the testing is to have a bout that's on an 'even playing field'...to continue when that playing field has been altered makes it a joke IMO

                  the fight would have to be scrapped IMO and the PR nightmare begins

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
                    the premise of the testing is to have a bout that's on an 'even playing field'...to continue when that playing field has been altered makes it a joke IMO

                    the fight would have to be scrapped IMO and the PR nightmare begins
                    So was Pac-Clottey a joke for there testing procedures?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
                      No ****.

                      Im asking will he agree to the 2 year ban.
                      Probably , cause if you're willing to do the testing you are most likely clean, so why not. Plus, I don't think Pac plans on fighting for too much longer, I hope he does, but it seems as if he will fight one more time and then retire.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP