Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Anti-Doping Agency: "A positive test for Shane or Floyd means a 2 year BAN!"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
    Duh I know that.

    THIS

    Is a whole different issue.

    I dont think Pac would agree to that.


    19 days for Clottey vs 14 days for Floyd



    seems pretty ****** not to take it given the reasons Pac has given.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

      If he agree's to take the test I don't think he'd have any problem with the ban. If he tested positive a two year ban would be the least of his worries.
      My only reasoning for why I think he would make a fuss about it is because he doesnt know what he takes as it is on top of the fact that some fluke supplement could give him a positive test IMO.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by 1toTHADOME View Post
        how is it an issue? he already agreed to it.. everything is nice and dandy except for the cutoff date. this whole two year penalty is NOT an issue.


        ....... ......Pac didn't agree to ****......a 24 day cut off = no point in doing any sort of testing......don't take my word for it ask Travis Tygert, Victor Conte or Don Caitlin..........

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
          "The head of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, Travis Tygart, participated in the call and detailed that Mayweather and Mosley will be subject to random urine and/or blood tests from now "until and after the fight." A positive test, Tygart said, would leave the boxer suspended from the sport for two years, a condition he said both fighters have agreed to."






          That is HUGE. Damn will Pac agree to that?
          This is a Quote from a ESPN article get your facts straight ...

          That could include a two-year ban for a failed test.

          "At the end of the day, USADA has no jurisdiction," Keith Kizer, executive director of the Nevada Athletic Commission, told The Associated Press. "Like any medical test, if a fighter wants to do anything more than what we require, more power to them."

          http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...ory?id=5006342

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
            My only reasoning for why I think he would make a fuss about it is because he doesnt know what he takes as it is on top of the fact that some fluke supplement could give him a positive test IMO.
            but he already agreed to EVERYTHING except for the cutoff date. if agreed to taking the test dont you think he'd be informed of the penalty already? why would he just agree on something he doesnt know the penalty of?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Sweetxyience View Post
              This is a Quote from a ESPN article get your facts straight ...

              That could include a two-year ban for a failed test.

              "At the end of the day, USADA has no jurisdiction," Keith Kizer, executive director of the Nevada Athletic Commission, told The Associated Press. "Like any medical test, if a fighter wants to do anything more than what we require, more power to them."

              http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...ory?id=5006342
              Hellooooooo


              Shane and Mayweather AGREED on the 2 year ban.

              Will Pac?

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
                Hellooooooo


                Shane and Mayweather AGREED on the 2 year ban.

                Will Pac?

                Like I said, a ban would be the least of his worries if he tested positive. But why would he HAVE to agree to it if the USADA has no jurisdiction?

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
                  Hellooooooo


                  Shane and Mayweather AGREED on the 2 year ban.

                  Will Pac?
                  What are they gonna ban themselves from fighting...NO ONE IS ENFORCING THE BAN, NOT THE COMMISSION, NOT THE PROMOTERS, NOT THE OLYMPIC COMMITTEE . WHY IS THIS EVEN A QUESTION?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

                    Like I said, a ban would be the least of his worries if he tested positive. But why would he HAVE to agree to it if the USADA has no jurisdiction?
                    Thats exactly my point. He would have to agree to it its not mandatory. A 2 year ban would deter any thought of cheating which is why its in place.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Sweetxyience View Post
                      What are they gonna ban themselves from fighting...NO ONE IS ENFORCING THE BAN, NOT THE COMMISSION, NOT THE PROMOTERS, NOT THE OLYMPIC COMMITTEE . WHY IS THIS EVEN A QUESTION?
                      So why are Shane and Floyd agreeing to the 2 year ban?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP