US Anti-Doping Agency: "A positive test for Shane or Floyd means a 2 year BAN!"

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

i don't understand how anyone can post quotes/excerpts without providing a link? (i know it's legit but give credit where it's due and have the posters decide the credibility of the source)

Case closed.

This has been reported LIVE on ESPN and articles are everywhere now. This is fail proof.

[Heru]

No wonder Pacquiao doesn't want to take the tests. A 2 year suspension would take him out of his prime.

[Carpe Diem]

Take the test. Tsk tsk tsk tsk...

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

If the committee says no, than Pac has no choice, huh?

Not quite. If its something that has to be "agreed" to that means it wasnt set in stone.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

No wonder Pacquiao doesn't want to take the tests. A 2 year suspension would take him out of his prime.

These penalties are TOUGH.

[FLYBOY]

they are making NSAC drug penalties look like a joke....

Agreed. Most (or should I say all) sports commissions these days are a joke. MONEY $ is what dictates them... Random urine and BLOOD testing can get very expensive and they don't want to spend that much money.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

so does the fight go on if one of them pops?

[V.WEBB]

so does the fight go on if one of them pops?

Very good question Mak. Hopefully more info on this comes out.

[icebergisonfire]

so does the fight go on if one of them pops?

How can they fight if they are banned for two years.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

How can they fight if they are banned for two years.

so you're saying its an on-the-spot ban if they pop and the fight is off? or are you just trying to be a wise ass?