NOBODY was concerned before

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JAB5239
    Dallas Cowboys
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 28305
    • 5,353
    • 4,523
    • 73,018

    #381
    Originally posted by Hannibal Barca
    You think he should take the test, but condone the fact that he's lied and contradicted himself in attempts to avoid the testing polices you believe he should take? Well that makes tons of sense Jab.
    Kid, you haven't owned ****. Probably don't own a pair of your own shoes.

    I'd like to see him take the test for the sake of boxing, not Floyd. I 100% understand him backing out of the tests after being slandered. I would never let anyone dictate to me, especially if I am the p4p king. Had this been official testing and he back out I would be condemning him just like you are now.

    Comment

    • Hannibal Barca
      Hand of the Gods
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 2538
      • 152
      • 0
      • 8,893

      #382
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      Because they can't get past all of Pacquiao's lies. We're almost there though.
      The name escapes me now, but someones already proposed OST's for one of the Klits next fights.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #383
        Originally posted by JAB5239
        Kid, you haven't owned ****. Probably don't own a pair of your own shoes.

        I'd like to see him take the test for the sake of boxing, not Floyd. I 100% understand him backing out of the tests after being slandered. I would never let anyone dictate to me, especially if I am the p4p king. Had this been official testing and he back out I would be condemning him just like you are now.
        Why would it be for Floyd's sake? Because Floyd asked? So if Hattona sked it would be for Hatton's sake?

        How do you explain his lies and contradictions? It's ok because it was for Manny's sake?

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #384
          Originally posted by Hannibal Barca
          The name escapes me now, but someones already proposed OST's for one of the Klits next fights.
          Povetkin. And now Wladimir is looking at Haye

          I kid, I kid

          Comment

          • JAB5239
            Dallas Cowboys
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 28305
            • 5,353
            • 4,523
            • 73,018

            #385
            Originally posted by Ray*
            Are you here to answer my question or defend manny? Again my question is have you ask yourself as a boxing fan why your number 1 boxer in the world would refuse testing? Please try and get past the He didnt want to give into Mayweather demands..

            Ray, he never refused testing. He refused a demand made by Floyd. What rule did he break?

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30197
              • 1,346
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #386
              Yeah Im calling bull****. Its okay for Pacquiao to make Cotto the CHAMPION weigh 145 and put his belt on the line but no one can ask him to do ****?

              Please.

              Pac had no issues accepting the Diamond Belt that Souliman created for him. Just incase Cotto didnt want his belt on the line.

              But he cant accept drug testing on a 14 day cut off?

              Then offers 24 days when he takes a blood test for Clottey 19 days away from the fight?

              Cut it out.

              Comment

              • AKATheMack
                Unreasonably Logical
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2004
                • 11155
                • 430
                • 285
                • 19,179

                #387
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                Who did Pacquiao agree with?
                You really are ignorant, he agreed to stricter testing with Floyd what they did not agree upon was how strict the testing would be. The only reason he brought up 24 days was because Mayweather insisted on stricter testing therefore on the issue of stricter testing they were agreeable.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #388
                  Originally posted by AKATheMack
                  You really are ignorant, he agreed to stricter testing with Floyd what they did not agree upon was how strict the testing would be. The only reason he brought up 24 days was because Mayweather insisted on stricter testing therefore on the issue of stricter testing they were agreeable.
                  No he didn't agree with anyone. He made up his own schedule and agreed with himself. Ignorant? Yeah right.

                  Comment

                  • JAB5239
                    Dallas Cowboys
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 28305
                    • 5,353
                    • 4,523
                    • 73,018

                    #389
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    Why would it be for Floyd's sake? Because Floyd asked? So if Hattona sked it would be for Hatton's sake?

                    How do you explain his lies and contradictions? It's ok because it was for Manny's sake?

                    Why don't you explain the Mayweather lies that started all this? Oh, I forgot, you don't need any proof to call someone guilty.

                    Comment

                    • V.WEBB
                      CBVM
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 14329
                      • 621
                      • 174
                      • 21,453

                      #390
                      Originally posted by JAB5239
                      Kid, you haven't owned ****. Probably don't own a pair of your own shoes.

                      I'd like to see him take the test for the sake of boxing, not Floyd. I 100% understand him backing out of the tests after being slandered. I would never let anyone dictate to me, especially if I am the p4p king. Had this been official testing and he back out I would be condemning him just like you are now.
                      Come on JAB, he was SLANDERED BEFORE negotiations started..why did he engage into them if he was so worried about being "slandered"?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP