At what moment did Pacquiao become better than Mayweather?

[pasawayako]

dude, isnt it funny how people give pac full credit for beating shot fighters but floyd no credit for beating some of the same fighters first and when they were healthy and confident



can wait for these *******s to go away when floyd whoops his ass

pac is 3-1 underdog while floyd is the favorite to win against dela hoya.

[fdotorres]

thats exactly what it means and what he said. that they were shot and wanted to avoid any challeneging fights

so a guy with just 1 fight at LW challenging any WW isn't risky?

thanks for the info

[mazdaru]

pac is 3-1 underdog while floyd is the favorite to win against dela hoya.

FLoyd is always the fav b.c people expect the Greatest fighters to be just that....Great.

sorry, cant say the same for pac

[fdotorres]

FLoyd is always the fav b.c people expect the Greatest fighters to be just that....Great.

sorry, cant say the same for pac

i thought it had to do more with pacquiao being a SFW and not a WW

[mazdaru]

so a guy with just 1 fight at LW challenging any WW isn't risky?

thanks for the info

your point is moot when your fighter fights shot fighters, which is the case for pac. he did that in the lower weight class too. does EM and MAB ring a bell?

[mazdaru]

i thought it had to do more with pacquiao being a SFW and not a WW

nope, b/c when floyd moved up, he was still the favorite. you fail.

Floyd>Pac

and lets not act like pac is some small guy, he should have moved up in weight a while ago. he just wasnt good enough to do so.

this cat was coming in at 144+ on fight night in the lower weight class. talk about big guy picking on the little guys. too bad, JMM handed him his ass

[fdotorres]

nope, b/c when floyd moved up, he was still the favorite. you fail.

Floyd>Pac

floyd moved up 1 weight class against a shot fighter

pac moved up 3 (almost 4) weight classes against a shot fighter

[imscythe]

your point is moot when your fighter fights shot fighters, which is the case for pac. he did that in the lower weight class too. does EM and MAB ring a bell?

This reasoning is absolutely ridiculous. When pacquiao was about to fight guys bigger than him as he was moving up the weight he was always the underdog, a lot less people appreciated his talent and skills and when he eventually demolished those bigger guys he was praised by boxing experts but at the same time the haters will say that he fought shot fighters, when most of them before the fight happened had pac on the losing end.

That's why I don't need to argue with these kind of people, it's pointless.

[MrInevitable01]

For those of you who think he will win (I'm not decided yet, I'll decide after their next fights).

Surely at 130 Mayweather would have beaten Pacquiao who lost to Morales once and drew/won SD over Marquez. At 135? Pacquiao looked like a beast but he was only fighting David Diaz so it's hard to hell. 140 and 147 Pac beat up Hatton ODLH and Cotto but if you can pin point the moment Pac became good enough to beat Floyd let me know...

His progression is so strange, haven't seen anything else like it in boxing.

Until he beats Mayweather, he never will be....

[fdotorres]

your point is moot when your fighter fights shot fighters, which is the case for pac. he did that in the lower weight class too. does EM and MAB ring a bell?

my fighter? pac isn't my fighter. the only ****** relying on fanatism here is you, not me

pac fought a shot and drained DLH while he was moving up 4 weight classes in a short time frame. floyd fought a shot DLH while moving up a single weight class

floyd fought an overweight hatton. pac fought hatton at his best weight

pac fought marquez at his best weights in two controversial fights. floyd beat up a very overweight marquez

tell it like it is *****